From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6A2C4363D for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:26:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD0C2076C for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:26:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="M409mRzb"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="M409mRzb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5DD0C2076C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5xV03cVGzDqPN for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 01:26:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=63.128.21.124; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com; envelope-from=cai@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M409mRzb; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=M409mRzb; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5xQG65mZzDqCT for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 01:23:17 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602080595; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=arCJetUQyffSDjg12W9Bfh+TxnVKzaBR2KG2Ej+1vzg=; b=M409mRzb628uzZ68SsN2J1PL6ufzCjZ2rxed2sN6wd114fgGqxO7Era09Z6K/cRY/ta2Nc 28y1OeIBnmYYVjSRCwiXA3VDwZ3NNJTZkbBGUh7I6NxO1p3DXLYUevJ6OzgU4S2wS3lSfo FtJTTa95e8OgZUmNYyAmUspoOAlgNlE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602080595; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=arCJetUQyffSDjg12W9Bfh+TxnVKzaBR2KG2Ej+1vzg=; b=M409mRzb628uzZ68SsN2J1PL6ufzCjZ2rxed2sN6wd114fgGqxO7Era09Z6K/cRY/ta2Nc 28y1OeIBnmYYVjSRCwiXA3VDwZ3NNJTZkbBGUh7I6NxO1p3DXLYUevJ6OzgU4S2wS3lSfo FtJTTa95e8OgZUmNYyAmUspoOAlgNlE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-236-yazGlPxIPsy3s1B2I8T-qg-1; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:23:11 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yazGlPxIPsy3s1B2I8T-qg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD8E10857E8; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-66-246.rdu2.redhat.com (ovpn-66-246.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.66.246]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51433757DF; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] powerpc/smp: Optimize update_mask_by_l2 From: Qian Cai To: Srikar Dronamraju Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:23:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20201007141745.GM12031@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200921095653.9701-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200921095653.9701-10-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20201007141745.GM12031@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nathan Lynch , Gautham R Shenoy , Michael Neuling , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Nicholas Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Oliver O'Halloran , Satheesh Rajendran , linuxppc-dev , Valentin Schneider Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 2020-10-07 at 19:47 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > Can you confirm if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is enabled in your config? Yes, https://gitlab.com/cailca/linux-mm/-/blob/master/powerpc.config We tested here almost daily on linux-next.