Re: ["RFC PATCH" 2/2] powerpc/mm: Conslidate numa_enable check and min_common_depth check

["Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>]

On 6/29/19 2:06 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Update min_common_depth = -1 if numa is disabled. This
> help us to avoid checking for both in different code paths.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 9 +++++----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> index f6d68baeaa96..c84062a390cc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int associativity_to_nid(const __be32 *associativity)
>   {
>   	int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>   
> -	if (min_common_depth == -1 || !numa_enabled)
> +	if (min_common_depth == -1)
>   		goto out;
>   
>   	if (of_read_number(associativity, 1) >= min_common_depth)
> @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)
>   
>   	if (numa_enabled == 0) {
>   		printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA disabled by user\n");
> +		min_common_depth = -1;
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -747,7 +748,7 @@ void __init dump_numa_cpu_topology(void)
>   	unsigned int node;
>   	unsigned int cpu, count;
>   
> -	if (min_common_depth == -1 || !numa_enabled)
> +	if (min_common_depth == -1)
>   		return;
>   
>   	for_each_online_node(node) {
> @@ -812,7 +813,7 @@ static void __init find_possible_nodes(void)
>   	struct device_node *rtas;
>   	u32 numnodes, i;
>   
> -	if (min_common_depth <= 0 || !numa_enabled)
> +	if (min_common_depth <= 0)
>   		return;
>   
>   	rtas = of_find_node_by_path("/rtas");
> @@ -1014,7 +1015,7 @@ int hot_add_scn_to_nid(unsigned long scn_addr)
>   	struct device_node *memory = NULL;
>   	int nid;
>   
> -	if (!numa_enabled || (min_common_depth < 0))
> +	if (min_common_depth < 0)
>   		return first_online_node;
>   
>   	memory = of_find_node_by_path("/ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory");
> 

I was not sure whether a reverse switch if better so that we have

if (!numa_enabled) check every where and we do the below

@@ -625,14 +624,15 @@ static int __init parse_numa_properties(void)

  	if (numa_enabled == 0) {
  		printk(KERN_WARNING "NUMA disabled by user\n");
-		min_common_depth = -1;
  		return -1;
  	}

  	min_common_depth = find_min_common_depth();

-	if (min_common_depth < 0)
+	if (min_common_depth < 0) {
+		numa_enabled = false;
  		return min_common_depth;
+	}


-aneesh