From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
mahesh@linux.ibm.com, oohall@gmail.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, terry.bowman@amd.com,
tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:48:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPoIDW_Yt90VgHL8@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30fe11dd-3f21-4a61-adb0-74e39087c84c@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:20:58PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> 2025/10/20 22:24, Lukas Wunner:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 10:17:10PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> > > > > .slot_reset()
> > > > > => pci_restore_state()
> > > > > => pci_aer_clear_status()
> > > >
> > > > This was added in 2015 by b07461a8e45b. The commit claims that
> > > > the errors are stale and can be ignored. It turns out they cannot.
> > > >
> > > > So maybe pci_restore_state() should print information about the
> > > > errors before clearing them?
> > >
> > > While that could work, we would lose the error severity information at
> >
> > Wait, we've got that saved in pci_cap_saved_state, so we could restore
> > the severity register, report leftover errors, then clear those errors?
>
> You're right that the severity register is also sticky, so we could
> retrieve error severity directly from AER registers.
>
> However, I have concerns about implementing this approach:
[...]
> 3. Architectural consistency: As you noted earlier, "pci_restore_state()
> is only supposed to restore state, as the name implies, and not clear
> errors." Adding error reporting to this function would further violate
> this principle - we'd be making it do even more than just restore state.
>
> Would you prefer I implement this broader change, or shall we proceed
> with the targeted helper function approach for now? The helper function
> solves the immediate problem while keeping the changes focused on the
> AER recovery path.
My opinion is that b07461a8e45b was wrong and that reported errors
should not be silently ignored. What I'd prefer is that if
pci_restore_state() discovers unreported errors, it asks the AER driver
to report them.
We've already got a helper to do that: aer_recover_queue()
It queues up an entry in AER's kfifo and asks AER to report it.
So far the function is only used by GHES. GHES allocates the
aer_regs argument from ghes_estatus_pool using gen_pool_alloc().
Consequently aer_recover_work_func() uses ghes_estatus_pool_region_free()
to free the allocation. That prevents using aer_recover_queue()
for anything else than GHES. It would first be necessary to
refactor aer_recover_queue() + aer_recover_work_func() such that
it can cope with arbitrary allocations (e.g. kmalloc()).
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 2:41 [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 10:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 12:58 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 13:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 14:17 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 14:24 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 15:20 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-23 10:48 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-10-24 6:43 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:38 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-21 1:51 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI/ERR: Use pcie_aer_is_native() to check for native AER control Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 10:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 13:09 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 13:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 14:45 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-23 10:29 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24 3:09 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-24 3:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24 3:38 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-24 4:03 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24 5:37 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:43 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:44 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-21 1:33 ` Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPoIDW_Yt90VgHL8@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).