linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
To: mohan@in.ibm.com
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:58:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac119a2f080a47cf41f7c916010eaccd@bga.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070606113134.GC4916@in.ibm.com>

On Jun 6, 2007, at 6:31 AM, Mohan Kumar M wrote:
> I updated the patch with correct tab spacing and removed unnecessary
> "else".


> In some of the PPC970 based systems, interrupt would be distributed to
> offline cpus also even when booted with "maxcpus=1". So check whether
> cpu online map and cpu present map are equal or not. If they are equal
> default_distrib_server is used as interrupt server otherwise boot cpu
> (default_server) used as interrupt server.
>
> In addition to this, if an interrupt is assigned to a specific cpu (ie
> smp affinity) and if that cpu is not online, the earlier code used to
> return the default_distrib_server as interrupt server. This patch
> introduces an additional paramter to the get_irq function ie
> strict_check, based on this parameter, if the cpu is not online either
> default_distrib_server or -1 is returned.


The code is structured cleanly.  However, when testing this patch, I 
found (1) you printed the mask as a cpulist instead of a cpumask.  
Since the user writes a cpumask to /proc/irq/xx/smp_affinity, it would 
make more sense to print a mask in the error message.

However, this is all mute because (2) the common in /kenrel/irq/proc.c 
checks that a cpu in the mask is online and returns -EINVAL to the user 
without calling the ->set_affinity hook (we have no select_smp_affinity 
hook arch code).   Unless there is another path to call ->set_affinity, 
we can only trigger the case of no online cpu by racing between setting 
the affinity and taking a cpu offline.

Does anyone know of another path to set the affinity?  If not I would 
remove this extra logic and change the behavior from ignore to set to 
default server.


milton

>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -static int get_irq_server(unsigned int virq)
> +static int get_irq_server(unsigned int virq, unsigned int 
> strict_check)
>  {
> -	unsigned int server;
> +	int server;
>  	/* For the moment only implement delivery to all cpus or one cpu */
>  	cpumask_t cpumask = irq_desc[virq].affinity;
>  	cpumask_t tmp = CPU_MASK_NONE;
> @@ -166,22 +166,25 @@ static int get_irq_server(unsigned int v
>  	if (!distribute_irqs)
>  		return default_server;
>
> -	if (cpus_equal(cpumask, CPU_MASK_ALL)) {
> -		server = default_distrib_server;
> -	} else {
> +	if (!cpus_equal(cpumask, CPU_MASK_ALL)) {
>  		cpus_and(tmp, cpu_online_map, cpumask);
>
> -		if (cpus_empty(tmp))
> -			server = default_distrib_server;
> -		else
> -			server = get_hard_smp_processor_id(first_cpu(tmp));
> +		server = first_cpu(tmp);
> +
> +		if (server < NR_CPUS)
> +			return get_hard_smp_processor_id(server);
> +
> +		if (strict_check)
> +			return -1;
>  	}
>
> -	return server;
> +	if (cpus_equal(cpu_online_map, cpu_present_map))
> +		return default_distrib_server;
>
> +	return default_server;
>  }
>

...

> +	/*
> +	 * For the moment only implement delivery to all cpus or one cpu.
> +	 * Get current irq_server for the given irq
> +	 */
> +	irq_server = get_irq_server(irq, 1);
> +	if (irq_server == -1) {
> +		char cpulist[128];
> +		cpulist_scnprintf(cpulist, sizeof(cpulist), cpumask);
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "xics_set_affinity: No online cpus in "
> +				"the mask %s for irq %d\n", cpulist, virq);
> +		return;
>  	}

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-08  4:55 [PATCH] Fix interrupt distribution in ppc970 Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18  4:37 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18  5:14   ` Mohan Kumar M
2006-12-18 10:57   ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 11:42     ` [Fastboot] " Mohan Kumar M
2007-01-02 15:07       ` Doug Maxey
2007-03-06 13:57     ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 14:16       ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 16:55         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-06 17:37           ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-07  4:53             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07 10:52               ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-09  8:57                 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10  7:06                   ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-10 12:54                     ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-10 16:59                     ` Milton Miller
2007-04-11  1:16                       ` Michael Ellerman
2007-04-19 11:52                         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-20  5:45                           ` Milton Miller
2007-04-26  9:24                             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-04-26 14:42                               ` Milton Miller
2007-05-03 14:47                                 ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-05-06  6:52                                   ` Milton Miller
2007-06-04 10:54                                     ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-06  9:43                                       ` Milton Miller
2007-06-06 11:31                                         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-11  1:58                                           ` Milton Miller [this message]
2007-06-11 18:07                                             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-12 14:51                                             ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-06-15 16:35                                               ` Milton Miller
2007-03-07  6:06         ` [Fastboot] " Vivek Goyal
2007-03-07 10:46           ` Michael Ellerman
2007-03-06 22:05       ` Nathan Lynch
2007-03-07  5:01         ` Mohan Kumar M
2007-03-07  8:52         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-03-07  9:10           ` Mohan Kumar M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac119a2f080a47cf41f7c916010eaccd@bga.com \
    --to=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mohan@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).