From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B755DDEA2 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:13:00 +1000 (EST) To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Change 440GP platform to ppc440 References: <17961.22721.462194.785356@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070424000153.GD23995@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:12:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070424000153.GD23995@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> (Josh Boyer's message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:01:54 -0500") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > I recall dimly that there was some user-visible difference between the > > 440GP and the other 440 processors, and that's why we made the > > platform string different. I don't recall what the difference was. FWIW, I've run the same userspace (binaries) on 405GPr, 440GP and 440SPe without any problems. Not that I'm a 4xx expert by any stretch, but I don't know of anything special about the 440GP. - R.