From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "sj-iport-3.cisco.com", Issuer "Cisco SSCA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127DCDDE41 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:19:10 +1000 (EST) From: Roland Dreier To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] powerpc/44x: Add PowerPC 44x simple platform support References: <496103659f7b122a8301703b055ef4c6bd3092af.1219160188.git.jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200808201533.22258.arnd@arndb.de> <1219243548.26429.25.camel@jdub.homelinux.org> <20080820131124.05cfee9f@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:19:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080820131124.05cfee9f@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (Josh Boyer's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:11:24 -0400") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd@ozlabs.org, Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Except that logically doesn't make much sense. Why would you have a > list of mpc52xx and 44x boards together? They require completely > different kernels because the MMU and drive set is entirely different. > > Or am I totally missing what you are saying? Yeah, I wasn't clear -- I meant to add a new helper like of_flat_dt_is_compatible_list() (not sure of the name) that takes a node and a NULL-terminated array of strings, and then mpc5200_simple_probe() can become a one-liner, along with mpc5121_generic_probe(), tqm85xx_probe(), ppc44x_probe(), etc. - R.