From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A9DC67BAD for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2006 10:07:23 +1100 (EST) To: Hoang-Nam Nguyen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests References: From: Roland Dreier Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:07:20 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Christoph Raisch , linuxppc-dev-bounces+hnguyen=de.ibm.com@ozlabs.org, Hoang-Nam Nguyen List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > That's fair. I understand your decision. And thanks for queueing for > 2.6.20. Can you please brief me on patch procedures for post-2.6.19? What do you mean by post-2.6.19? Things go into 2.6.19.x via stable@kernel.org, if that's what you're asking. Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describes what patches are appropriate for 2.6.19.x, and given that we're so close to the 2.6.19 final release, I'm working under similar rules for what I'm going to merge into 2.6.19.