linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@de.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
	OF-General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
	Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] IB/ehca: Support for multiple event queues
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:04:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adalkdgz65x.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707121746.36763.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:46:35 +0200")

 > The eHCA driver can now handle multiple event queues (read: interrupt
 > sources) instead of one. The number of available EQs is selected via the
 > nr_eqs module parameter.

 > CQs are either assigned to the EQs based on the comp_vector index or, if the
 > dist_eqs module parameter is supplied, using a round-robin scheme.

Do you have any data on how well this round-robin assignment works?
It seems not quite right to me for the driver to advertise nr_eqs
completion vectors, but then if round-robin is turned on to ignore the
consumer's decision about which vector to use.

Maybe if round-robin is turned on you should report 0 as the number of
completion vectors?  Or maybe we should allow well-known values for
the completion vector passed to ib_create_cq to allow consumers to
specify a policy (like round robin) instead of a particular vector?
Maybe the whole interface is broken and we should only be exposing
policies to consumers instead of the specific vector?

I think I would rather hold off on multiple EQs for this merge window
and plan on having something really solid and thought-out for 2.6.24.

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-16 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-12 15:45 [PATCH 00/10] IB/ehca: Multiple Event Queues, MR/MW rework, large page MRs, fixes Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] IB/ehca: Support for multiple event queues Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 16:04   ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-07-16 20:34     ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 20:37     ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2007-07-17  3:48       ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17  4:37         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-07-17 17:52           ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17 21:32             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2007-07-19 15:03             ` Hoang-Nam Nguyen
2007-07-17  5:57         ` [ofa-general] " Shirley Ma
2007-07-12 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/10] IB/ehca: Fix HW level autodetection Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] IB/ehca: fix memory leak in error path of ehca_get_dma_mr() Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/10] IB/ehca: use common error code mapping instead of specific ones Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 17:14   ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 20:35     ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:51 ` [PATCH 05/10] IB/ehca: use #define for "pages per register_rpage" instead of hardcoded value Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:51 ` [PATCH 06/10] IB/ehca: use macro to calculate number of chunks in a mem block Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:52 ` [PATCH 07/10] IB/ehca: MR/MW structure refactoring Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] IB/ehca: Restructure ehca_set_pagebuf() Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] IB/ehca: Fix warnings issued by checkpatch.pl Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 15:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] IB/ehca: Support large page MRs Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-16 17:37   ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-16 21:11     ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-17  3:50       ` Roland Dreier
2007-07-17  6:29         ` Joachim Fenkes
2007-07-12 17:15 ` [PATCH 00/10] IB/ehca: Multiple Event Queues, MR/MW rework, large page MRs, fixes Roland Dreier
2007-07-13  8:26   ` Joachim Fenkes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adalkdgz65x.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=fenkes@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).