From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "sj-iport-1.cisco.com", Issuer "Cisco SSCA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31EBDE034 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:34:36 +1000 (EST) From: Roland Dreier To: Stefan Roscher Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IB/ehca: Replace vmalloc with kmalloc References: <200904211716.45245.ossrosch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:34:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200904211716.45245.ossrosch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Stefan Roscher's message of "Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:16:44 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: fenkes@de.ibm.com, LKML , OF-EWG , LinuxPPC-Dev , raisch@de.ibm.com, alexschm@de.ibm.com, stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > + queue->queue_pages = kmalloc(nr_of_pages * sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); How big might this buffer be? Any chance of allocation failure due to memory fragmentation? - R.