From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "sj-iport-1.cisco.com", Issuer "Cisco SSCA" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360BBDDDFB for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:13:55 +1100 (EST) From: Roland Dreier To: Joachim Fenkes Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Change misleading error message References: <200806061835.43802.fenkes@de.ibm.com> <48499C11.7030504@gmail.com> <200811251358.06729.fenkes@de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:13:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: <200811251358.06729.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:58:06 +0100") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: LKML , OF-EWG , LinuxPPC-Dev , Christoph Raisch , OF-General , Alexander Schmidt , Stefan Roscher List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > The error message printed when the eHCA driver prevents memory hotplug is > misleading -- the user might think that hot-removing the lhca, hotplugging > memory, then hot-adding the lhca again will work, but it doesn't. That's too bad... I applied this patch but out of curiousity, why doesn't the hot-remove/hot-add work? I would have thought that re-registering all of memory after the hot-add would do the right thing.