From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2501DDF0F for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:35:40 +1000 (EST) To: Joachim Fenkes Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] IB/ehca: Set SEND_GRH flag for all non-LL UD QPs on eHCA2 References: <200707091502.22407.fenkes@de.ibm.com> <200707091527.14272.fenkes@de.ibm.com> From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 14:35:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: <200707091527.14272.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:27:13 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: LKML , LinuxPPC-Dev , Christoph Raisch , OF-General , Stefan Roscher List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Out of curiousity, does this mean that a GRH will be sent on all UD messages (for non-LL QPs)? What decides if a QP is LL or not? - R.