From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05121C43331 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A967020578 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.b="RVI5RsBx" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A967020578 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xilinx.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48s0cl4q9hzDqSv for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:01:59 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com (client-ip=40.107.220.54; helo=nam11-co1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; envelope-from=michals@xilinx.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xilinx.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@xilinx.onmicrosoft.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com header.b=RVI5RsBx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam11on2054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.220.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48s0ZX09lmzDqSY for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:00:03 +1100 (AEDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PbVHZvYQSo8WEaG5tyBaF75ebj1E6rEOguJStGghRBXxI5lG27RViebd0+hRVILVis/1W1VzjZ13AcYpk0gDnfQ8+NxgIaeWTbgJKfrV8FAEFkgatX8L0l3SnW82HhSDafPhfNzV+o81T4U6nW5ka+RwiQcLfnvKMAfZBfs46YQfiJimNCkQ0qnkd/TEq3fxS4oqt64C+plW/gFRJNmfr++tDnjC6XJQuQkWvfE6dYVdUjsPRl6Rfx76rvvMbyNSwvs7sHVytLfYks3UOqm4SjzU3ReKHGsAK13iOB/HDEeS+wGd0HGmjCLou5QG5IGGACA3T3+vvzot6jPiIJfNlg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NDgClzBf/Hti3579BZ19ywYfTGYv5EUbB3FPmLePVDE=; b=ksdZn/fejDxiUA+GscFQBQAJSKMLqoxWX42V6I1WH4HllO5E8Cr14MZwA17JRYmNgGtlSjW/RpMtDPK2HZPtWNjQnMkdCmEt/+AH6suirEOh+34nsv19gnSkKmb5SjbfhJ8YZhiu8Ekd5F6j8YIE0GHnJQRrp8jr9Ghf52SluHZJzZnEB1xeq3EF2u0AY619RE3IXwF2IaH5D5WMIfE2hqbmT4aJ6TVvCfU0U+SRzy0sO833eSCAhQU0bXHB9h7pxgMVjB/sSgk1o0Ai3jsAGRsCcJFHs3haFx3+JVR89VP5jgUasc3WSMcbVu1rDnYns3+w9J73RzCc5rApAd1htA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 149.199.60.83) smtp.rcpttodomain=c-s.fr smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xilinx.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-xilinx-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NDgClzBf/Hti3579BZ19ywYfTGYv5EUbB3FPmLePVDE=; b=RVI5RsBxdSGY0U2xeeg0M+ok9Lqoi1PuwW7hLBMbt2SBm0BqpeEp5YGUxa6+frKB8coh/mNVksd3F1gW51nwwYdyTxCVE+tqfHndsnXTrD5Ut/CJEV1Q3ajNTeNW1U0IGqoZr1TYUaQ2yR//Ltm4eg6FnW/yagU5H0czyU7SMss= Received: from SN4PR0501CA0032.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:40::45) by BL0PR02MB5523.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:84::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.20; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:59:57 +0000 Received: from SN1NAM02FT027.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:803:40:cafe::e) by SN4PR0501CA0032.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:803:40::45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.12 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:59:57 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 149.199.60.83) smtp.mailfrom=xilinx.com; c-s.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; c-s.fr; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=xilinx.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of xilinx.com designates 149.199.60.83 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=149.199.60.83; helo=xsj-pvapsmtpgw01; Received: from xsj-pvapsmtpgw01 (149.199.60.83) by SN1NAM02FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.2856.17 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:59:56 +0000 Received: from unknown-38-66.xilinx.com ([149.199.38.66] helo=xsj-pvapsmtp01) by xsj-pvapsmtpgw01 with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1jJAsO-0004WQ-09; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:59:56 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by xsj-pvapsmtp01 with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1jJAsI-0003Q5-Ss; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:59:50 -0700 Received: from xsj-pvapsmtp01 (mailman.xilinx.com [149.199.38.66]) by xsj-smtp-dlp1.xlnx.xilinx.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 02V6xiVp004073; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:59:44 -0700 Received: from [172.30.17.108] by xsj-pvapsmtp01 with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1jJAsB-0003OK-Jh; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:59:43 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: Remove support for ppc405/440 Xilinx platforms To: Christophe Leroy , Michael Ellerman , Andy Shevchenko , Arnd Bergmann References: <20200327131026.GT1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200327131531.GU1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200327141434.GA1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> <87mu7xum41.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <11765c82-bf1a-466c-760d-f9a4c4d1d5f1@c-s.fr> From: Michal Simek Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:59:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <11765c82-bf1a-466c-760d-f9a4c4d1d5f1@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-RCIS-Action: ALLOW X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-8.2.0.1013-23620.005 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes;Yes X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.60.83; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:xsj-pvapsmtpgw01; PTR:unknown-60-83.xilinx.com; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(376002)(46966005)(426003)(316002)(186003)(110136005)(966005)(2616005)(26005)(54906003)(4326008)(6666004)(478600001)(356004)(7366002)(8936002)(31686004)(336012)(8676002)(53546011)(44832011)(47076004)(82740400003)(2906002)(70586007)(7416002)(81166006)(81156014)(31696002)(9786002)(7406005)(36756003)(5660300002)(70206006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 79617cb0-b9ca-4211-a17e-08d7d5411f19 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BL0PR02MB5523: X-LD-Processed: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c,ExtAddr X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:10000; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0359162B6D X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: +RoxM6hOZlHdjJ8rjXjfETbqRf1ywO8mmR6/uTeNbVdkNR2R9Pn8vHx3wJSF5SXnwJf20P082QK4A4TvLPgiY97WlZGw+VZDQNNWfvADw3qXBHeK0m0CEpDEI2OmJ3e1wQqlNIiw17RepTVJP/+egr65/geJ98UWWN5QjWfOUg+NzTmUSLfCdSLvuXfbLJZkjiQhawG19ff5DFGFqyqkx9E/OBGooDbE/KSuuznKk4Zzas6LTG+Gd1pvv3lrF3FFb0TLruvSWbVHklISJxdrq5IMK267vPWe5hnN91rDFPOu03yTlURFYnhYe/gHDqnu3Y4n21Y/rDbq2pPSSEYiVZVlqDG5Dz2GRqQxMmcDswudr4u8UPWPK8qlomIpd5XbIMv+bW7IZkSwYTGAXuAHwP/JvTiQzlQXI+pEgLdEWlKIFbYhulSjRwHuKdge9lSoIs1d7BLPfScfkhK9XBJYZe7Sc29q85vj9VaG5Z20NIkY2dUuALD3LgbUIGdSvCVSomt4IthhosEPNG98H/mhsMc+Ysp9EZfmcrYGO2/ZGriQguEGH9UcuQ11JUFXgdbdqt41trJlQzRbFWRB045L69pq+1o/kFGmFcmm7vFS26Y= X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2020 06:59:56.5449 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 79617cb0-b9ca-4211-a17e-08d7d5411f19 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=657af505-d5df-48d0-8300-c31994686c5c; Ip=[149.199.60.83]; Helo=[xsj-pvapsmtpgw01] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR02MB5523 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kate Stewart , Mark Rutland , "Desnes A. Nunes do Rosario" , Geert Uytterhoeven , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , ALSA Development Mailing List , dri-devel , Jaroslav Kysela , Richard Fontana , Paul Mackerras , Miquel Raynal , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Fabio Estevam , Sasha Levin , Stephen Rothwell , Jonathan Corbet , Masahiro Yamada , Takashi Iwai , YueHaibing , Michal Simek , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linux ARM , Leonardo Bras , DTML , Andrew Donnellan , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Marc Zyngier , Alistair Popple , linuxppc-dev , Nicholas Piggin , Alexios Zavras , Mark Brown , git@xilinx.com, Linux Fbdev development list , Jonathan Cameron , Thomas Gleixner , Allison Randal , Michal Simek , Wei Hu , Christian Lamparter , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nick Desaulniers , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Armijn Hemel , Rob Herring , Enrico Weigelt , "David S. Miller" , Thiago Jung Bauermann Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 31. 03. 20 8:56, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 31/03/2020 à 07:30, Michael Ellerman a écrit : >> Christophe Leroy writes: >>> Le 27/03/2020 à 15:14, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : >>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:55PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:15 PM Andy Shevchenko >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:10:26PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:12 PM Michal Simek >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>>>> It does raise a follow-up question about ppc40x though: is it >>>>>>>> time to >>>>>>>> retire all of it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who knows? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have in possession nice WD My Book Live, based on this >>>>>>> architecture, and I >>>>>>> won't it gone from modern kernel support. OTOH I understand that >>>>>>> amount of real >>>>>>> users not too big. >>>>>> >>>>>> +Cc: Christian Lamparter, whom I owe for that WD box. >>>>> >>>>> According to https://openwrt.org/toh/wd/mybooklive, that one is >>>>> based on >>>>> APM82181/ppc464, so it is about several generations newer than what I >>>>> asked about (ppc40x). >>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, and I have Amiga board, but that one is being used only for >>>>>>> testing, so, >>>>>>> I don't care much. >>>>> >>>>> I think there are a couple of ppc440 based Amiga boards, but again, >>>>> not 405 >>>>> to my knowledge. >>>> >>>> Ah, you are right. No objections from ppc40x removal! >>> >>> Removing 40x would help cleaning things a bit. For instance 40x is the >>> last platform still having PTE_ATOMIC_UPDATES. So if we can remove 40x >>> we can get rid of PTE_ATOMIC_UPDATES completely. >>> >>> If no one objects, I can prepare a series to drop support for 40x >>> completely. >>> >>> Michael, any thought ? >> >> I have no attachment to 40x, and I'd certainly be happy to have less >> code in the tree, we struggle to keep even the modern platforms well >> maintained. >> >> At the same time I don't want to render anyone's hardware obsolete >> unnecessarily. But if there's really no one using 40x then we should >> remove it, it could well be broken already. >> >> So I guess post a series to do the removal and we'll see if anyone >> speaks up. >> > > Ok, series sent out, see > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=167757 ok. I see you have done it completely independently of my patchset. Would be better if you can base it on the top of my 2 patches because they are in conflict now and I need to also remove virtex 44x platform also with alsa driver. Thanks, Michal