* [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references"
@ 2022-08-23 11:59 Michael Ellerman
2022-08-23 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell Michael Ellerman
2022-08-31 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references" Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2022-08-23 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
This reverts commit 79b74a68486765a4fe685ac4069bc71366c538f5.
It broke booting on IBM Cell machines when the kernel is also built with
CONFIG_PPC_PS3=y.
That's because FW_FEATURE_NATIVE_ALWAYS = 0 does have an important
effect, which is to clear the PS3 ALWAYS features from
FW_FEATURE_ALWAYS.
Note that CONFIG_PPC_NATIVE has since been renamed
CONFIG_PPC_HASH_MMU_NATIVE.
Fixes: 79b74a684867 ("powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.17+
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/firmware.h | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/firmware.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/firmware.h
index 398e0b5e485f..ed6db13a1d7c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/firmware.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/firmware.h
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ enum {
FW_FEATURE_POWERNV_ALWAYS = 0,
FW_FEATURE_PS3_POSSIBLE = FW_FEATURE_LPAR | FW_FEATURE_PS3_LV1,
FW_FEATURE_PS3_ALWAYS = FW_FEATURE_LPAR | FW_FEATURE_PS3_LV1,
+ FW_FEATURE_NATIVE_POSSIBLE = 0,
+ FW_FEATURE_NATIVE_ALWAYS = 0,
FW_FEATURE_POSSIBLE =
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES
FW_FEATURE_PSERIES_POSSIBLE |
@@ -92,6 +94,9 @@ enum {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PS3
FW_FEATURE_PS3_POSSIBLE |
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_HASH_MMU_NATIVE
+ FW_FEATURE_NATIVE_ALWAYS |
#endif
0,
FW_FEATURE_ALWAYS =
@@ -103,6 +108,9 @@ enum {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_PS3
FW_FEATURE_PS3_ALWAYS &
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_HASH_MMU_NATIVE
+ FW_FEATURE_NATIVE_ALWAYS &
#endif
FW_FEATURE_POSSIBLE,
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell
2022-08-23 11:59 [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references" Michael Ellerman
@ 2022-08-23 11:59 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-24 1:50 ` Jordan Niethe
2022-08-31 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references" Michael Ellerman
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2022-08-23 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
The semi-recent changes to MSR handling when entering RTAS (firmware)
cause crashes on IBM Cell machines. An example trace:
kernel tried to execute user page (2fff01a8) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
BUG: Unable to handle kernel instruction fetch
Faulting instruction address: 0x2fff01a8
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
BE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=4 NUMA Cell
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 6.0.0-rc2-00433-gede0a8d3307a #207
NIP: 000000002fff01a8 LR: 0000000000032608 CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c0000000015236b0 TRAP: 0400 Tainted: G W (6.0.0-rc2-00433-gede0a8d3307a)
MSR: 0000000008001002 <ME,RI> CR: 00000000 XER: 20000000
...
NIP 0x2fff01a8
LR 0x32608
Call Trace:
0xc00000000143c5f8 (unreliable)
.rtas_call+0x224/0x320
.rtas_get_boot_time+0x70/0x150
.read_persistent_clock64+0x114/0x140
.read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset+0x24/0x80
.timekeeping_init+0x40/0x29c
.start_kernel+0x674/0x8f0
start_here_common+0x1c/0x50
Unlike PAPR platforms where RTAS is only used in guests, on the IBM Cell
machines Linux runs with MSR[HV] set but also uses RTAS, provided by
SLOF.
Fix it by copying the MSR[HV] bit from the MSR value we've just read
using mfmsr into the value used for RTAS.
It seems like we could also fix it using an #ifdef CELL to set MSR[HV],
but that doesn't work because it's possible to build a single kernel
image that runs on both Cell native and pseries.
Fixes: b6b1c3ce06ca ("powerpc/rtas: Keep MSR[RI] set when calling RTAS")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.19+
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
index 9a434d42e660..6ce95ddadbcd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
@@ -109,8 +109,12 @@ _GLOBAL(enter_rtas)
* its critical regions (as specified in PAPR+ section 7.2.1). MSR[S]
* is not impacted by RFI_TO_KERNEL (only urfid can unset it). So if
* MSR[S] is set, it will remain when entering RTAS.
+ * If we're in HV mode, RTAS must also run in HV mode, so extract MSR_HV
+ * from the saved MSR value and insert into the value RTAS will use.
*/
+ extrdi r0, r6, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r6, MSR_ME | MSR_RI)
+ insrdi r6, r0, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
li r0,0
mtmsrd r0,1 /* disable RI before using SRR0/1 */
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell
2022-08-23 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell Michael Ellerman
@ 2022-08-24 1:50 ` Jordan Niethe
2022-08-24 12:04 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2022-08-24 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 21:59 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> The semi-recent changes to MSR handling when entering RTAS (firmware)
> cause crashes on IBM Cell machines. An example trace:
>
> kernel tried to execute user page (2fff01a8) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)
> BUG: Unable to handle kernel instruction fetch
> Faulting instruction address: 0x2fff01a8
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> BE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=4 NUMA Cell
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 6.0.0-rc2-00433-gede0a8d3307a #207
> NIP: 000000002fff01a8 LR: 0000000000032608 CTR: 0000000000000000
> REGS: c0000000015236b0 TRAP: 0400 Tainted: G W (6.0.0-rc2-00433-gede0a8d3307a)
> MSR: 0000000008001002 <ME,RI> CR: 00000000 XER: 20000000
> ...
> NIP 0x2fff01a8
> LR 0x32608
> Call Trace:
> 0xc00000000143c5f8 (unreliable)
> .rtas_call+0x224/0x320
> .rtas_get_boot_time+0x70/0x150
> .read_persistent_clock64+0x114/0x140
> .read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset+0x24/0x80
> .timekeeping_init+0x40/0x29c
> .start_kernel+0x674/0x8f0
> start_here_common+0x1c/0x50
>
> Unlike PAPR platforms where RTAS is only used in guests, on the IBM Cell
> machines Linux runs with MSR[HV] set but also uses RTAS, provided by
> SLOF.
>
> Fix it by copying the MSR[HV] bit from the MSR value we've just read
> using mfmsr into the value used for RTAS.
>
> It seems like we could also fix it using an #ifdef CELL to set MSR[HV],
> but that doesn't work because it's possible to build a single kernel
> image that runs on both Cell native and pseries.
>
> Fixes: b6b1c3ce06ca ("powerpc/rtas: Keep MSR[RI] set when calling RTAS")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.19+
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
> index 9a434d42e660..6ce95ddadbcd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
> @@ -109,8 +109,12 @@ _GLOBAL(enter_rtas)
> * its critical regions (as specified in PAPR+ section 7.2.1). MSR[S]
> * is not impacted by RFI_TO_KERNEL (only urfid can unset it). So if
> * MSR[S] is set, it will remain when entering RTAS.
> + * If we're in HV mode, RTAS must also run in HV mode, so extract MSR_HV
> + * from the saved MSR value and insert into the value RTAS will use.
> */
Interestingly it looks like these are the first uses of these extended
mnemonics in the kernel?
> + extrdi r0, r6, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
Or in non-mnemonic form...
rldicl r0, r6, 64 - MSR_HV_LG, 63
> LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r6, MSR_ME | MSR_RI)
> + insrdi r6, r0, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
Or in non-mnemonic form...
rldimi r6, r0, MSR_HV_LG, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
It is ok to use r0 as a scratch register as it is loaded with 0 afterwards anyway.
>
> li r0,0
> mtmsrd r0,1 /* disable RI before using SRR0/1 */
Reviewed-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell
2022-08-24 1:50 ` Jordan Niethe
@ 2022-08-24 12:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-25 1:22 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2022-08-24 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 21:59 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> The semi-recent changes to MSR handling when entering RTAS (firmware)
>> cause crashes on IBM Cell machines. An example trace:
...
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
>> index 9a434d42e660..6ce95ddadbcd 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
>> @@ -109,8 +109,12 @@ _GLOBAL(enter_rtas)
>> * its critical regions (as specified in PAPR+ section 7.2.1). MSR[S]
>> * is not impacted by RFI_TO_KERNEL (only urfid can unset it). So if
>> * MSR[S] is set, it will remain when entering RTAS.
>> + * If we're in HV mode, RTAS must also run in HV mode, so extract MSR_HV
>> + * from the saved MSR value and insert into the value RTAS will use.
>> */
>
> Interestingly it looks like these are the first uses of these extended
> mnemonics in the kernel?
We used to have at least one use I know of in TM code, but it's since
been converted to C.
>> + extrdi r0, r6, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
>
> Or in non-mnemonic form...
> rldicl r0, r6, 64 - MSR_HV_LG, 63
It's rldicl all the way down.
>> LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r6, MSR_ME | MSR_RI)
>> + insrdi r6, r0, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
>
> Or in non-mnemonic form...
> rldimi r6, r0, MSR_HV_LG, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
I think the extended mnemonics are slightly more readable than the
open-coded versions?
> It is ok to use r0 as a scratch register as it is loaded with 0 afterwards anyway.
I originally used r7, but r0 is more obviously safe.
>>
>> li r0,0
>> mtmsrd r0,1 /* disable RI before using SRR0/1 */
>
> Reviewed-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
Thanks.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell
2022-08-24 12:04 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2022-08-25 1:22 ` Jordan Niethe
2022-08-25 8:03 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2022-08-25 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 22:04 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 21:59 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > The semi-recent changes to MSR handling when entering RTAS (firmware)
> > > cause crashes on IBM Cell machines. An example trace:
> ...
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
> > > index 9a434d42e660..6ce95ddadbcd 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
> > > @@ -109,8 +109,12 @@ _GLOBAL(enter_rtas)
> > > * its critical regions (as specified in PAPR+ section 7.2.1). MSR[S]
> > > * is not impacted by RFI_TO_KERNEL (only urfid can unset it). So if
> > > * MSR[S] is set, it will remain when entering RTAS.
> > > + * If we're in HV mode, RTAS must also run in HV mode, so extract MSR_HV
> > > + * from the saved MSR value and insert into the value RTAS will use.
> > > */
> >
> > Interestingly it looks like these are the first uses of these extended
> > mnemonics in the kernel?
>
> We used to have at least one use I know of in TM code, but it's since
> been converted to C.
>
> > > + extrdi r0, r6, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
> >
> > Or in non-mnemonic form...
> > rldicl r0, r6, 64 - MSR_HV_LG, 63
>
> It's rldicl all the way down.
>
> > > LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r6, MSR_ME | MSR_RI)
> > > + insrdi r6, r0, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
> >
> > Or in non-mnemonic form...
> > rldimi r6, r0, MSR_HV_LG, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
>
> I think the extended mnemonics are slightly more readable than the
> open-coded versions?
Yeah definitely. I was just noting the plain instruction as I think we
have some existing patterns that may be potential candidates for conversion to the
extended version. Like in exceptions-64s.S
rldicl. r0, r12, (64-MSR_TS_LG), (64-2)
to
extrdi. r0, r12, 2, 63 - MSR_TS_LG - 1
Would it be worth changing these?
>
> > It is ok to use r0 as a scratch register as it is loaded with 0 afterwards anyway.
>
> I originally used r7, but r0 is more obviously safe.
>
> > > li r0,0
> > > mtmsrd r0,1 /* disable RI before using SRR0/1 */
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
> cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell
2022-08-25 1:22 ` Jordan Niethe
@ 2022-08-25 8:03 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2022-08-25 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2022-08-24 at 22:04 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
>> > On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 21:59 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > > The semi-recent changes to MSR handling when entering RTAS (firmware)
>> > > cause crashes on IBM Cell machines. An example trace:
>> ...
>> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
>> > > index 9a434d42e660..6ce95ddadbcd 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
>> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_entry.S
>> > > @@ -109,8 +109,12 @@ _GLOBAL(enter_rtas)
>> > > * its critical regions (as specified in PAPR+ section 7.2.1). MSR[S]
>> > > * is not impacted by RFI_TO_KERNEL (only urfid can unset it). So if
>> > > * MSR[S] is set, it will remain when entering RTAS.
>> > > + * If we're in HV mode, RTAS must also run in HV mode, so extract MSR_HV
>> > > + * from the saved MSR value and insert into the value RTAS will use.
>> > > */
>> >
>> > Interestingly it looks like these are the first uses of these extended
>> > mnemonics in the kernel?
>>
>> We used to have at least one use I know of in TM code, but it's since
>> been converted to C.
>>
>> > > + extrdi r0, r6, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
>> >
>> > Or in non-mnemonic form...
>> > rldicl r0, r6, 64 - MSR_HV_LG, 63
>>
>> It's rldicl all the way down.
>>
>> > > LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r6, MSR_ME | MSR_RI)
>> > > + insrdi r6, r0, 1, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
>> >
>> > Or in non-mnemonic form...
>> > rldimi r6, r0, MSR_HV_LG, 63 - MSR_HV_LG
>>
>> I think the extended mnemonics are slightly more readable than the
>> open-coded versions?
>
> Yeah definitely. I was just noting the plain instruction as I think we
> have some existing patterns that may be potential candidates for conversion to the
> extended version. Like in exceptions-64s.S
>
> rldicl. r0, r12, (64-MSR_TS_LG), (64-2)
> to
> extrdi. r0, r12, 2, 63 - MSR_TS_LG - 1
>
> Would it be worth changing these?
Some folks are very comfortable with rldicl and probably prefer the
former, but I'm not sure there's many of those people around anymore :)
I think the extrdi is a bit more readable.
You could use MSR_TS_T_LG to avoid the - 1? All those uses have a
comment about it being 2 bits already.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references"
2022-08-23 11:59 [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references" Michael Ellerman
2022-08-23 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell Michael Ellerman
@ 2022-08-31 13:12 ` Michael Ellerman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2022-08-31 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: rmclure, ldufour, npiggin
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 21:59:51 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This reverts commit 79b74a68486765a4fe685ac4069bc71366c538f5.
>
> It broke booting on IBM Cell machines when the kernel is also built with
> CONFIG_PPC_PS3=y.
>
> That's because FW_FEATURE_NATIVE_ALWAYS = 0 does have an important
> effect, which is to clear the PS3 ALWAYS features from
> FW_FEATURE_ALWAYS.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/fixes.
[1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references"
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/310d1344e3c58cc2d625aa4e52cfcb7d8a26fcbf
[2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/91926d8b7e71aaf5f84f0cf208fc5a8b7a761050
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-31 13:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-23 11:59 [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references" Michael Ellerman
2022-08-23 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/rtas: Fix RTAS MSR[HV] handling for Cell Michael Ellerman
2022-08-24 1:50 ` Jordan Niethe
2022-08-24 12:04 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-25 1:22 ` Jordan Niethe
2022-08-25 8:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-08-31 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Remove unused FW_FEATURE_NATIVE references" Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).