public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	mpetlan@redhat.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
	irogers@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com, Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com,
	Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:56:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae76k1BvfgcYI18K@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260426093930.47809-1-atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>

On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 03:09:30PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> In redhat perftool testsuite, observed fail for this test:
>     -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_sched :: test_timehist :: --with-summary (output regexp parsing)
> 
> This led to analysis of "perf sched timehist" summary options.
> 
>   # perf sched record -a -o ./perf.data -- sleep 0.1
>    This will record using perf sched record
> 
> perf sched timeliest has two options "-s" and "-S"
>   # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -S
>  -S : Captures summary also at the end
> 
>   # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -s
>  -s : Captures only summary
> 
> The test saves -s result which has only summary and compares with
> summary which comes at the end from -S . Since there is a difference
> in these two, test fails.
> 
> Checking the behaviour change in -S and -s results, difference is:
> 
>                   rcu_sched[16]       2          4        0.013      0.001       0.003       0.006   33.23       0
>                migration/11[73]       2          1        0.006      0.006       0.006       0.006    0.00       0
>                 migration/3[33]       2          1        0.006      0.006       0.006       0.006    0.00       0
>  -               :216753[216753]      -1          1        0.041      0.041       0.041       0.041    0.00       0
>  +                 sleep[216753]      -1          1        0.041      0.041       0.041       0.041    0.00       0
>                 migration/8[58]       2          1        0.005      0.005       0.005       0.005    0.00       0
>             NetworkManager[811]       1          2        0.089      0.028       0.044       0.060   36.06       0
>                migration/13[83]       2          1        0.005      0.005       0.005       0.005    0.00       0
> 
> Here 216753 is pid for sleep which is a zombie process. This is
> happening in latest kernel due to an update in "-S" result.
> In -S, the process name appears in the results "sleep[216753]",
> where as in the -s, only pid is present in the summary result
> ":216753[216753]".
> 
> After commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names
> of processes in zombie state")
> for -S option, if process name is using pid, it uses different way to
> set it. So that we get the process name and not just Pid.
> 
> This change went in only for timehist_print_sample() function.
> Add this improvement in generic place so that even -s option (which
> captures summary) also will have meaningful information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Namhyung

> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index 555247568e7a..ee1b89a6af50 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> @@ -2197,11 +2197,6 @@ static void timehist_print_sample(struct perf_sched *sched,
>  		printf(" ");
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
> -                const char *prev_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "prev_comm");
> -                thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
> -        }
> -
>  	printf(" %-*s ", comm_width, timehist_get_commstr(thread));
>  
>  	if (sched->show_prio)
> @@ -2890,6 +2885,15 @@ static int timehist_sched_change_event(const struct perf_tool *tool,
>  			itr->last_thread = NULL;
>  		}
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * If the process name is not set for the thread, use "prev_comm"
> +		 * to set it. Otherwise the sched summary will have just pid information
> +		 */
> +		if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
> +			const char *prev_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "prev_comm");
> +			thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
> +		}
> +
>  		if (!sched->summary_only)
>  			timehist_print_sample(sched, evsel, sample, &al, thread, t, state);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-27  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-26  9:39 [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options Athira Rajeev
2026-04-27  5:56 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-27  6:43 ` Venkat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae76k1BvfgcYI18K@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com \
    --cc=Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com \
    --cc=Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox