From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
mpetlan@redhat.com, tmricht@linux.ibm.com, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
irogers@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com, Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com,
Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:56:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae76k1BvfgcYI18K@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260426093930.47809-1-atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
On Sun, Apr 26, 2026 at 03:09:30PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> In redhat perftool testsuite, observed fail for this test:
> -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_sched :: test_timehist :: --with-summary (output regexp parsing)
>
> This led to analysis of "perf sched timehist" summary options.
>
> # perf sched record -a -o ./perf.data -- sleep 0.1
> This will record using perf sched record
>
> perf sched timeliest has two options "-s" and "-S"
> # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -S
> -S : Captures summary also at the end
>
> # perf sched -i ./perf.data timehist -s
> -s : Captures only summary
>
> The test saves -s result which has only summary and compares with
> summary which comes at the end from -S . Since there is a difference
> in these two, test fails.
>
> Checking the behaviour change in -S and -s results, difference is:
>
> rcu_sched[16] 2 4 0.013 0.001 0.003 0.006 33.23 0
> migration/11[73] 2 1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.00 0
> migration/3[33] 2 1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.00 0
> - :216753[216753] -1 1 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.00 0
> + sleep[216753] -1 1 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.041 0.00 0
> migration/8[58] 2 1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.00 0
> NetworkManager[811] 1 2 0.089 0.028 0.044 0.060 36.06 0
> migration/13[83] 2 1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.00 0
>
> Here 216753 is pid for sleep which is a zombie process. This is
> happening in latest kernel due to an update in "-S" result.
> In -S, the process name appears in the results "sleep[216753]",
> where as in the -s, only pid is present in the summary result
> ":216753[216753]".
>
> After commit 39f473f6d0b2 ("perf sched timehist: decode process names
> of processes in zombie state")
> for -S option, if process name is using pid, it uses different way to
> set it. So that we get the process name and not just Pid.
>
> This change went in only for timehist_print_sample() function.
> Add this improvement in generic place so that even -s option (which
> captures summary) also will have meaningful information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> index 555247568e7a..ee1b89a6af50 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
> @@ -2197,11 +2197,6 @@ static void timehist_print_sample(struct perf_sched *sched,
> printf(" ");
> }
>
> - if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
> - const char *prev_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "prev_comm");
> - thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
> - }
> -
> printf(" %-*s ", comm_width, timehist_get_commstr(thread));
>
> if (sched->show_prio)
> @@ -2890,6 +2885,15 @@ static int timehist_sched_change_event(const struct perf_tool *tool,
> itr->last_thread = NULL;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If the process name is not set for the thread, use "prev_comm"
> + * to set it. Otherwise the sched summary will have just pid information
> + */
> + if (!thread__comm_set(thread)) {
> + const char *prev_comm = evsel__strval(evsel, sample, "prev_comm");
> + thread__set_comm(thread, prev_comm, sample->time);
> + }
> +
> if (!sched->summary_only)
> timehist_print_sample(sched, evsel, sample, &al, thread, t, state);
> }
> --
> 2.47.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-27 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-26 9:39 [PATCH] tools/perf/sched: Update process names of processes in zombie state for both -s and -S options Athira Rajeev
2026-04-27 5:56 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2026-04-27 6:43 ` Venkat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ae76k1BvfgcYI18K@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=Shivani.Nittor@ibm.com \
--cc=Tanushree.Shah@ibm.com \
--cc=Tejas.Manhas1@ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox