From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
"Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad@darnok.org>,
"Guan Xuetao" <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] arm64: use swiotlb_alloc and swiotlb_free
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:16:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af49a676-142b-fd37-a395-67d76f7d35fa@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180110080932.14157-23-hch@lst.de>
On 10/01/18 08:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The generic swiotlb_alloc and swiotlb_free routines already take care
> of CMA allocations and adding GFP_DMA32 where needed, so use them
> instead of the arm specific helpers.
It took a while to satisfy myself that the GFP_DMA(32) handling ends up
equivalent to the current behaviour, but I think it checks out. This
will certainly help with the long-overdue cleanup of this file that I've
had sat around half-finished for ages.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 46 +++------------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 6b6985f15d02..53205c02b18a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ config ARM64
> select COMMON_CLK
> select CPU_PM if (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
> select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
> + select DMA_DIRECT_OPS
> select EDAC_SUPPORT
> select FRAME_POINTER
> select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 0d641875b20e..a96ec0181818 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -91,46 +91,6 @@ static int __free_from_pool(void *start, size_t size)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static void *__dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> - dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> - unsigned long attrs)
> -{
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32) &&
> - dev->coherent_dma_mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32))
> - flags |= GFP_DMA32;
> - if (dev_get_cma_area(dev) && gfpflags_allow_blocking(flags)) {
> - struct page *page;
> - void *addr;
> -
> - page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(dev, size >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> - get_order(size), flags);
> - if (!page)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - *dma_handle = phys_to_dma(dev, page_to_phys(page));
> - addr = page_address(page);
> - memset(addr, 0, size);
> - return addr;
> - } else {
> - return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags);
> - }
> -}
> -
> -static void __dma_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> - void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> - unsigned long attrs)
> -{
> - bool freed;
> - phys_addr_t paddr = dma_to_phys(dev, dma_handle);
> -
> -
> - freed = dma_release_from_contiguous(dev,
> - phys_to_page(paddr),
> - size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> - if (!freed)
> - swiotlb_free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_handle);
> -}
> -
> static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> unsigned long attrs)
> @@ -152,7 +112,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> return addr;
> }
>
> - ptr = __dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
> + ptr = swiotlb_alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
> if (!ptr)
> goto no_mem;
>
> @@ -173,7 +133,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> return coherent_ptr;
>
> no_map:
> - __dma_free_coherent(dev, size, ptr, *dma_handle, attrs);
> + swiotlb_free(dev, size, ptr, *dma_handle, attrs);
> no_mem:
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -191,7 +151,7 @@ static void __dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> return;
> vunmap(vaddr);
> }
> - __dma_free_coherent(dev, size, swiotlb_addr, dma_handle, attrs);
> + swiotlb_free(dev, size, swiotlb_addr, dma_handle, attrs);
> }
>
> static dma_addr_t __swiotlb_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 8:09 consolidate swiotlb dma_map implementations Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 01/22] swiotlb: suppress warning when __GFP_NOWARN is set Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 02/22] arm64: rename swiotlb_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 12:13 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 03/22] ia64: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-12 13:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 04/22] powerpc: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-12 13:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 05/22] x86: " Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-12 13:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 06/22] swiotlb: rename swiotlb_free to swiotlb_exit Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-12 13:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 07/22] swiotlb: add common swiotlb_map_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 08/22] swiotlb: wire up ->dma_supported in swiotlb_dma_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 12:16 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-10 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 17:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 09/22] swiotlb: refactor coherent buffer freeing Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 10/22] swiotlb: refactor coherent buffer allocation Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 12:22 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-10 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 17:02 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-15 9:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 11/22] swiotlb: remove various exports Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 12/22] ia64: replace ZONE_DMA with ZONE_DMA32 Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 13/22] ia64: use generic swiotlb_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 14/22] ia64: clean up swiotlb support Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 15/22] ia64: remove an ifdef around the content of pci-dma.c Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 16/22] unicore32: use generic swiotlb_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 17/22] tile: replace ZONE_DMA with ZONE_DMA32 Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 18/22] tile: use generic swiotlb_ops Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 19/22] mips/netlogic: remove swiotlb support Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 20/22] mips: use swiotlb_{alloc,free} Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 21/22] arm64: replace ZONE_DMA with ZONE_DMA32 Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 12:58 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-10 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 17:10 ` Robin Murphy
2018-01-10 8:09 ` [PATCH 22/22] arm64: use swiotlb_alloc and swiotlb_free Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-10 13:16 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2018-01-10 8:23 ` consolidate swiotlb dma_map implementations Christian König
2018-01-16 7:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-16 8:22 ` Christian König
2018-01-16 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-01-16 8:52 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af49a676-142b-fd37-a395-67d76f7d35fa@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=konrad@darnok.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).