From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joe@perches.com>
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0106.hostedemail.com
 [216.40.44.106])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41gPRl5gFQzF18f
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Wed,  1 Aug 2018 17:03:59 +1000 (AEST)
Message-ID: <afa25468e62ae3259878d8a95e9ac96f6be9f88a.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] powerpc/traps: Print signal name for unhandled
 signals
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo
 <muriloo@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>, Andrew Donnellan
 <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, Cyril Bur
 <cyrilbur@gmail.com>, "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,  Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
 Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@gmail.com>, Sukadev Bhattiprolu
 <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Tobin C . Harding" <me@tobin.cc>,
 linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:03:50 -0700
In-Reply-To: <631e9a9b-dbbe-ede7-eb81-81520cc36ad5@c-s.fr>
References: <20180731145020.14009-1-muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
 <20180731145020.14009-6-muriloo@linux.ibm.com>
 <631e9a9b-dbbe-ede7-eb81-81520cc36ad5@c-s.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 08:37 +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
> Le 31/07/2018 à 16:50, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo a écrit :
> > This adds a human-readable name in the unhandled signal message.
> > Before this patch, a page fault looked like:
> >    pandafault[6303]: unhandled signal 11 at 100007d0 nip 1000061c lr 7fff93c55100 code 2 in pandafault[10000000+10000]
> > After this patch, a page fault looks like:
> >    pandafault[6352]: segfault (11) at 13a2a09f8 nip 13a2a086c lr 7fffb63e5100 code 2 in pandafault[13a2a0000+10000]
]]
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
[]
> > @@ -96,6 +96,41 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__debugger_fault_handler);
> >   #define TM_DEBUG(x...) do { } while(0)
> >   #endif
> >   
> > +static const char *signames[SIGRTMIN + 1] = {
> > +	"UNKNOWN",
> > +	"SIGHUP",			// 1
> > +	"SIGINT",			// 2
[]
> I don't think is is worth having that full table when we only use a few 
> of them. (As discussed in v1 https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/948802/)
> 
> I would suggest to instead use a function like this:
> 
> static const char *signame(int signr)
> {
> 	if (signr == SIGBUS)
> 		return "bus error";
> 	if (signr == SIGFPE)
> 		return "floating point exception";
> 	if (signr == SIGILL)
> 		return "illegal instruction";
> 	if (signr == SIGILL)
> 		return "segfault";
> 	if (signr == SIGTRAP)
> 		return "unhandled trap";
> 	return "unknown signal";
> }

trivia:

Unless the if tests are ordered most to least likely,
perhaps it would be better to use a switch/case and
let the compiler decide.

	switch (signr) {
	case SIGBUS:	return "bus error";
	case SIGFPE:	return "floating point exception";
	case SIGILL:	return "illegal instruction";
	case SIGSEGV:	return "segfault";
	case SIGTRAP:	return "unhandled trap";
	}
	return "unknown signal";
}