From: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
To: "Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)" <mkchauras@gmail.com>
Cc: maddy@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
chleroy@kernel.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
mkchauras@linux.ibm.com, kees@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Fix seccomp errno handling with GENERIC_ENTRY
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:54:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aj4UAGaPdaI1wEED@kunlun.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624171520.772408-1-mkchauras@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 10:45:20PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) wrote:
> After enabling GENERIC_ENTRY on PowerPC, seccomp filters using
> SCMP_ACT_ERRNO without an explicit errnoRet value return ENOSYS
> (Function not implemented) instead of the expected EPERM (Operation
> not permitted).
>
> The issue occurs in system_call_exception() when syscall_enter_from_user_mode()
> returns -1 to indicate the syscall should be skipped (e.g., blocked by seccomp).
> The current code treats this -1 as a syscall number and compares it against
> NR_syscalls. Since -1 (when cast to unsigned long) is greater than NR_syscalls,
> the code incorrectly returns -ENOSYS, overwriting the errno that seccomp
> already set via syscall_set_return_value().
>
> The generic entry code in syscall_trace_enter() calls __secure_computing(),
> which sets the appropriate errno in regs->gpr[3] and returns -1 to signal
> that the syscall should be skipped. However, the PowerPC syscall handler
> was not checking for this -1 return value before validating the syscall
> number.
>
> Fix this by explicitly checking if syscall_enter_from_user_mode() returns
> -1 and returning the value already set in regs->gpr[3] (the errno from
> seccomp) before performing the syscall number validation.
>
> This aligns PowerPC's behavior with other architectures using GENERIC_ENTRY
> and restores correct seccomp errno handling.
>
> Fixes: bee25f97ad24 ("powerpc: Enable GENERIC_ENTRY feature")
> Reported-by: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM) <mkchauras@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> index a9da2af6efa8..5b58c8d396c8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/syscall.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ notrace long system_call_exception(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long r0)
> add_random_kstack_offset();
> r0 = syscall_enter_from_user_mode(regs, r0);
>
> + /* Seccomp or ptrace may have set return value, skip syscall */
> + if (unlikely(r0 == -1L))
> + return regs->gpr[3];
this should use syscall_get_error instead of accessing the register
value directly. The error is represented differently in the scv and
non-scv case, and for non-scv case this will return wrong value.
Thanks
Michal
> +
> if (unlikely(r0 >= NR_syscalls)) {
> if (unlikely(trap_is_unsupported_scv(regs))) {
> /* Unsupported scv vector */
> --
> 2.54.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 17:15 [PATCH] powerpc/syscall: Fix seccomp errno handling with GENERIC_ENTRY Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya (IBM)
2026-06-24 17:44 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-06-26 5:54 ` Michal Suchánek [this message]
2026-06-29 4:50 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-06-26 7:50 ` Kees Cook
2026-06-26 14:30 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-26 14:31 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2026-06-29 4:54 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-06-29 13:31 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-06-29 17:02 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
2026-06-29 17:07 ` Michal Suchánek
2026-06-29 17:14 ` Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aj4UAGaPdaI1wEED@kunlun.suse.cz \
--to=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
--cc=mkchauras@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox