From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Yin Tirui <yintirui@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <luizcap@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@redhat.com>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, chenjun102@huawei.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 2/7] arm64/mm: use PTE-level pgprot for huge PFN helpers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:35:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aljsFdYEH1CvYhft@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526145003.88445-3-yintirui@huawei.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:49:58PM +0800, Yin Tirui wrote:
> Make the arm64 PMD/PUD PFN helpers use PTE-level pgprot_t as the basic
> format.
>
> pfn_pmd() and pfn_pud() now translate PTE-level attributes into block
> entries. pmd_pgprot() and pud_pgprot() translate block descriptor
> attributes back into PTE-level attributes.
>
> Remove mk_pmd_sect_prot() and mk_pud_sect_prot().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yin Tirui <yintirui@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 4 +--
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 4dfa42b7d053..c3ee12e14f86 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -511,16 +511,6 @@ static inline pmd_t pte_pmd(pte_t pte)
> return __pmd(pte_val(pte));
> }
>
> -static inline pgprot_t mk_pud_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot)
> -{
> - return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PUD_TYPE_MASK) | PUD_TYPE_SECT);
> -}
> -
> -static inline pgprot_t mk_pmd_sect_prot(pgprot_t prot)
> -{
> - return __pgprot((pgprot_val(prot) & ~PMD_TYPE_MASK) | PMD_TYPE_SECT);
> -}
> -
> static inline pte_t pte_swp_mkexclusive(pte_t pte)
> {
> return set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE));
> @@ -628,7 +618,13 @@ static inline pmd_t pmd_mkspecial(pmd_t pmd)
> #define __pmd_to_phys(pmd) __pte_to_phys(pmd_pte(pmd))
> #define __phys_to_pmd_val(phys) __phys_to_pte_val(phys)
> #define pmd_pfn(pmd) ((__pmd_to_phys(pmd) & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> -#define pfn_pmd(pfn,prot) __pmd(__phys_to_pmd_val((phys_addr_t)(pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT) | pgprot_val(prot))
> +static inline pmd_t pfn_pmd(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> +{
> + pmd_t pmd = __pmd(__phys_to_pmd_val((phys_addr_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) |
> + pgprot_val(prot));
> +
> + return pmd_mkhuge(pmd);
> +}
There's a slight potential difference in behaviour here, in that the old
mk_pXd_sect_prot() helpers would always return a pgprot_t with the valid
bit set, whereas pXd_mkhuge() preserve it from the input prot.
I couldn't find any places that cared about this, though, so:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 14:49 [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 0/7] mm: add huge pfnmap support for remap_pfn_range() Yin Tirui
2026-05-26 14:49 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 1/7] x86/mm: use PTE-level pgprot for huge PFN helpers Yin Tirui
2026-05-26 14:49 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 2/7] arm64/mm: " Yin Tirui
2026-07-16 14:35 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-05-26 14:49 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 3/7] powerpc/mm: " Yin Tirui
2026-05-26 14:50 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 4/7] mm/huge_memory: refactor copy_huge_pmd() Yin Tirui
2026-05-27 12:24 ` Dev Jain
2026-05-26 14:50 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 5/7] mm/huge_memory: refactor __split_huge_pmd_locked() Yin Tirui
2026-05-26 14:50 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 6/7] mm/huge_memory: make move_huge_pmd() use has_deposited_pgtable() Yin Tirui
2026-05-26 14:50 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 7/7] mm: add PMD-level PFNMAP support for remap_pfn_range() Yin Tirui
2026-05-26 15:33 ` [PATCH mm-unstable RFC v4 0/7] mm: add huge pfnmap " Lorenzo Stoakes
2026-05-27 2:57 ` Yin Tirui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aljsFdYEH1CvYhft@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew+kernel@donnellan.id.au \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chenjun102@huawei.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=coxu@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=luizcap@redhat.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yintirui@huawei.com \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox