From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cl@linux.com>
Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net
 (qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.40])
 by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740D92C00A0
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 02:54:57 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:54:49 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is
 no local memory
In-Reply-To: <20140128182947.GA1591@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1401290953270.23856@nuc>
References: <52e1d960.2715420a.3569.1013SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
 <52e1da8f.86f7440a.120f.25f3SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1401240946530.12886@nuc>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401241301120.10968@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20140124232902.GB30361@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401241543100.18620@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20140125001643.GA25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401241618500.20466@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
 <20140125011041.GB25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20140127055805.GA2471@lge.com> <20140128182947.GA1591@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, mpm@selenic.com,
 penberg@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org,
 Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> This helps about the same as David's patch -- but I found the reason
> why! ppc64 doesn't set CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES :) Expect a patch
> shortly for that and one other case I found.

Oww...