From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:96]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8242C0091 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:38:41 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:38:36 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter To: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory In-Reply-To: <20140203230026.GA15383@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <52e1da8f.86f7440a.120f.25f3SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <20140124232902.GB30361@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140125001643.GA25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140125011041.GB25344@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140127055805.GA2471@lge.com> <20140128182947.GA1591@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140203230026.GA15383@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Han Pingtian , mpm@selenic.com, penberg@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, paulus@samba.org, Anton Blanchard , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wanpeng Li List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > So what's the status of this patch? Christoph, do you think this is fine > as it is? Certainly enabling CONFIG_MEMORYLESS_NODES is the right thing to do and I already acked the patch.