From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B3mX0hGpzF2L4 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:20:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d7so2884003ioc.11 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:20:23 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes To: Laurent Dufour cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, Andrew Morton , kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Daniel Jordan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 06/24] mm: make pte_unmap_same compatible with SPF In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1520963994-28477-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1520963994-28477-7-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Laurent Dufour wrote: > >> @@ -2913,7 +2921,8 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) > >> int exclusive = 0; > >> int ret = 0; > > > > Initialization is now unneeded. > > I'm sorry, what "initialization" are you talking about here ? > The initialization of the ret variable. @@ -2913,7 +2921,8 @@ int do_swap_page(struct vm_fault *vmf) int exclusive = 0; int ret = 0; - if (!pte_unmap_same(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte)) + ret = pte_unmap_same(vmf); + if (ret) goto out; entry = pte_to_swp_entry(vmf->orig_pte); "ret" is immediately set to the return value of pte_unmap_same(), so there is no need to initialize it to 0.