From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:28:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Guillaume Knispel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: reliably replay pending edge-triggered irq In-Reply-To: <20100428235657.7120edd9.gknispel@proformatique.com> Message-ID: References: <1271941798-9659-1-git-send-email-gknispel@proformatique.com> <1271941798-9659-2-git-send-email-gknispel@proformatique.com> <20100428235657.7120edd9.gknispel@proformatique.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen , Russell King , Haavard Skinnemoen , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Michael Buesch , Ingo Molnar , Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Guillaume Knispel wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:42:11 +0200 (CEST) > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Guillaume Knispel wrote: > [snip] > > > acked and masked at controller level and IRQ_PENDING is set. > > > --- > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 4 ---- > > > arch/arm/configs/acs5k_defconfig | 1 - > > > arch/arm/configs/acs5k_tiny_defconfig | 1 - > > > > Changing the defconfigs should be a separate patch and I'm not > > going to push such a thing through the genirq tree. The stale > > entries do not hurt. > > Ok > In this separate patch, to I put "genirq" in the title? > Do I put it in the same series? Just keep them out for now and send them to the arch maintainers once the change hits linus tree. Thanks, tglx