* is there still any need PPC checking for "chosen@0"?
@ 2018-08-06 16:37 Robert P. J. Day
2018-08-08 13:58 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2018-08-06 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux PPC Mailing List
given that there are no .dts files in the current kernel code base
that define the node name "/chosen@0" instead of the proper "/chosen",
is there any need for arch/powerpc/boot/oflib.c to still make this
test:
chosen = of_finddevice("/chosen");
if (chosen == (phandle) -1) {
chosen = of_finddevice("/chosen@0"); <--- this
if (chosen == (phandle) -1) {
printf("no chosen\n");
return 0;
}
}
are there still PPC machines that require the recognition of
"/chosen@0"?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: is there still any need PPC checking for "chosen@0"?
2018-08-06 16:37 is there still any need PPC checking for "chosen@0"? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2018-08-08 13:58 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2018-08-08 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day, Linux PPC Mailing List, paulus
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca> writes:
> given that there are no .dts files in the current kernel code base
> that define the node name "/chosen@0" instead of the proper "/chosen",
A good portion of PPC machines get their device tree from firmware, not
from a dts that's in the kernel tree, so that's not a good indication.
> is there any need for arch/powerpc/boot/oflib.c to still make this
> test:
>
> chosen = of_finddevice("/chosen");
> if (chosen == (phandle) -1) {
> chosen = of_finddevice("/chosen@0"); <--- this
> if (chosen == (phandle) -1) {
> printf("no chosen\n");
> return 0;
> }
> }
>
> are there still PPC machines that require the recognition of
> "/chosen@0"?
It was added by Paul in:
66a45dd3620e ("powerpc: Make COFF zImages for old 32-bit powermacs")
So presumably there's an old powermac somewhere that needs it.
Given it's basically 2 extra lines of code I'd be inclined to leave it
alone.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-08 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-06 16:37 is there still any need PPC checking for "chosen@0"? Robert P. J. Day
2018-08-08 13:58 ` Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).