From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kvm5.telegraphics.com.au (kvm5.telegraphics.com.au [98.124.60.144]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5221A005A for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:38:19 +1000 (AEST) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 17:38:05 +1000 (AEST) From: Finn Thain To: Darren Hart cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC 07/24] x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use arch_nvram_ops methods instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram_write_byte() In-Reply-To: <20150603033401.GB49670@vmdeb7> Message-ID: References: <20150531010132.289674310@telegraphics.com.au> <20150531010134.129479218@telegraphics.com.au> <20150531041114.GA30431@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20150531143422.GA12337@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1433239768.902135.284523153.1200C3E3@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150603033401.GB49670@vmdeb7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Darren Hart wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:09:28AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > wrote: > > Test results were sent to me privately, and they are correct, so... > > > > Finn, unless there is some compelling reason not to - like they are MBs > worth of data, please submit these to the list in the future so we have > them for reference. Sure. Those results were just confirmation that this patch series doesn't affect input events read directly from /dev/input/by-path/platform-thinkpad_acpi-event given the the hotkey_source_mask settings discussed in this thread. > > > Acked-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > I'm fine with the changes, but they need to be submitted with the other > changes as this one change cannot compile independently in my tree. > > Finn, please work with whomever is pulling the series to include this in > their pull request. Right. > > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart Thanks for your review. --