linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: LEROY Christophe <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/25] m68k/atari: Move Atari-specific code out of drivers/char/nvram.c
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:29:14 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1901021542310.609@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.21.1812291053110.152@nippy.intranet>

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, I wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018, LEROY Christophe wrote:
> 
> > > --- a/drivers/char/nvram.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/char/nvram.c
> > > @@ -21,13 +21,6 @@
> > >   * ioctl(NVRAM_SETCKS) (doesn't change contents, just makes checksum valid
> > >   * again; use with care!)
> > >   *
> > > - * This file also provides some functions for other parts of the kernel that
> > > - * want to access the NVRAM: nvram_{read,write,check_checksum,set_checksum}.
> > > - * Obviously this can be used only if this driver is always configured into
> > > - * the kernel and is not a module. Since the functions are used by  
> > > some Atari
> > > - * drivers, this is the case on the Atari.
> > > - *
> > > - *
> > >   * 	1.1	Cesar Barros: SMP locking fixes
> > >   * 		added changelog
> > >   * 	1.2	Erik Gilling: Cobalt Networks support
> > > @@ -39,64 +32,6 @@
> > >
> > >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > >  #include <linux/nvram.h>
> > > -
> > > -#define PC		1
> > > -#define ATARI		2
> > > -
> > > -/* select machine configuration */
> > > -#if defined(CONFIG_ATARI)
> > > -#  define MACH ATARI
> > > -#elif defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__arm__)   
> > > /* and ?? */
> > > -#  define MACH PC
> > > -#else
> > > -#  error Cannot build nvram driver for this machine configuration.
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > -#if MACH == PC
> > > -
> > > -/* RTC in a PC */
> > > -#define CHECK_DRIVER_INIT()	1
> > > -
> > > -/* On PCs, the checksum is built only over bytes 2..31 */
> > > -#define PC_CKS_RANGE_START	2
> > > -#define PC_CKS_RANGE_END	31
> > > -#define PC_CKS_LOC		32
> > > -#define NVRAM_BYTES		(128-NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE)
> > > -
> > > -#define mach_check_checksum	pc_check_checksum
> > > -#define mach_set_checksum	pc_set_checksum
> > > -#define mach_proc_infos		pc_proc_infos
> > > -
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > -#if MACH == ATARI
> > > -
> > > -/* Special parameters for RTC in Atari machines */
> > > -#include <asm/atarihw.h>
> > > -#include <asm/atariints.h>
> > > -#define RTC_PORT(x)		(TT_RTC_BAS + 2*(x))
> > > -#define CHECK_DRIVER_INIT()	(MACH_IS_ATARI && ATARIHW_PRESENT(TT_CLK))
> > > -
> > > -#define NVRAM_BYTES		50
> > > -
> > > -/* On Ataris, the checksum is over all bytes except the checksum bytes
> > > - * themselves; these are at the very end */
> > > -#define ATARI_CKS_RANGE_START	0
> > > -#define ATARI_CKS_RANGE_END	47
> > > -#define ATARI_CKS_LOC		48
> > > -
> > > -#define mach_check_checksum	atari_check_checksum
> > > -#define mach_set_checksum	atari_set_checksum
> > > -#define mach_proc_infos		atari_proc_infos
> > > -
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > -/* Note that *all* calls to CMOS_READ and CMOS_WRITE must be done with
> > > - * rtc_lock held. Due to the index-port/data-port design of the RTC, we
> > > - * don't want two different things trying to get to it at once. (e.g. the
> > > - * periodic 11 min sync from kernel/time/ntp.c vs. this driver.)
> > > - */
> > > -
> > >  #include <linux/types.h>
> > >  #include <linux/errno.h>
> > >  #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> > > @@ -120,12 +55,9 @@ static int nvram_open_mode;	/* special open modes */
> > >  #define NVRAM_WRITE		1 /* opened for writing (exclusive) */
> > >  #define NVRAM_EXCL		2 /* opened with O_EXCL */
> > >
> > > -static int mach_check_checksum(void);
> > > -static void mach_set_checksum(void);
> > > -
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> > > -static void mach_proc_infos(unsigned char *contents, struct seq_file *seq,
> > > -								void *offset);
> > > +static void pc_nvram_proc_read(unsigned char *contents, struct  
> > > seq_file *seq,
> > > +			       void *offset);
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > >  /*
> > > @@ -139,6 +71,14 @@ static void mach_proc_infos(unsigned char  
> > > *contents, struct seq_file *seq,
> > >   * know about the RTC cruft.
> > >   */
> > >
> > > +#define NVRAM_BYTES		(128 - NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE)
> > > +
> > > +/* Note that *all* calls to CMOS_READ and CMOS_WRITE must be done with
> > > + * rtc_lock held. Due to the index-port/data-port design of the RTC, we
> > > + * don't want two different things trying to get to it at once. (e.g. the
> > > + * periodic 11 min sync from kernel/time/ntp.c vs. this driver.)
> > > + */
> > > +
> > >  unsigned char __nvram_read_byte(int i)
> > >  {
> > >  	return CMOS_READ(NVRAM_FIRST_BYTE + i);
> > > @@ -174,9 +114,22 @@ void nvram_write_byte(unsigned char c, int i)
> > >  }
> > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(nvram_write_byte);
> > >
> > > +/* On PCs, the checksum is built only over bytes 2..31 */
> > > +#define PC_CKS_RANGE_START	2
> > > +#define PC_CKS_RANGE_END	31
> > > +#define PC_CKS_LOC		32
> > > +
> > >  int __nvram_check_checksum(void)
> > >  {
> > > -	return mach_check_checksum();
> > > +	int i;
> > > +	unsigned short sum = 0;
> > > +	unsigned short expect;
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = PC_CKS_RANGE_START; i <= PC_CKS_RANGE_END; ++i)
> > > +		sum += __nvram_read_byte(i);
> > > +	expect = __nvram_read_byte(PC_CKS_LOC)<<8 |
> > > +	    __nvram_read_byte(PC_CKS_LOC+1);
> > > +	return (sum & 0xffff) == expect;
> > >  }
> > 
> > 
> > I don't understand how this is part of the code move.
> > Does the pc specific checksum becomes the generic one ?
> > 
> 
> This is not generic code, of course. Please refer to the two patches 
> that follow this one, in which all of the x86-specific code gets wrapped 
> with #ifdef CONFIG_X86.
> 
> This code gets moved because the MACH macro is made redundant. You might 
> defer this code motion to patch 4 or patch 5 but I don't see that as being 
> an improvement.
> 
> [...]
> 
> You may argue that there should be no CONFIG_X86 code in drivers/char. 

I think I now remember why this x86-specific code doesn't get moved from 
drivers/char to arch/x86 in this patch series.

In the case of PPC32 and PPC64, the nvram accessors are presently built-in 
using rules like this,

arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += nvram.o
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/Makefile:obj-y += ... opal-nvram.o ...
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile:obj-y := ... nvram.o ...

... or like this,

arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_NVRAM:m=y) += nvram.o

... except in one case they are in a separate module, though this doesn't 
work for built-in callers such as chrp_init2(),

arch/powerpc/platforms/chrp/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_NVRAM) += nvram.o

Anyway, I didn't think that any of these options would make it past the 
x86 maintainers so I just left the x86-specific code in place.

-- 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-02 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-26  0:37 [PATCH v8 00/25] Re-use nvram module Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 24/25] powerpc: Adopt nvram module for PPC64 Finn Thain
2018-12-29 22:36   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-30  3:28     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-31 12:32       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-01-01  1:38         ` Finn Thain
2019-01-04  8:45         ` Finn Thain
2019-01-06 23:36     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-07  4:52       ` Finn Thain
2019-01-08  9:27         ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-08 22:51           ` Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 07/25] char/nvram: Allow the set_checksum and initialize ioctls to be omitted Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 01/25] scsi/atari_scsi: Don't select CONFIG_NVRAM Finn Thain
2018-12-28 16:38   ` LEROY Christophe
2018-12-29  1:06     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-29  1:33       ` Michael Schmitz
2018-12-29  2:34         ` Finn Thain
2018-12-29  2:50           ` Michael Schmitz
2018-12-29 21:37             ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-30 17:50               ` LEROY Christophe
2018-12-30 18:06                 ` James Bottomley
2018-12-30 21:44                   ` Finn Thain
2018-12-30 22:45                     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-29 16:55         ` LEROY Christophe
2018-12-29 18:54           ` Michael Schmitz
2018-12-29  2:54   ` Michael Schmitz
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 18/25] powerpc: Implement nvram sync ioctl Finn Thain
2018-12-29 22:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-30  7:25     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-30 23:13       ` Finn Thain
2018-12-31 12:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-31 12:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-01-01  1:06         ` Finn Thain
2019-01-02 22:25           ` Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 09/25] m68k/atari: Implement arch_nvram_ops methods and enable CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NVRAM_OPS Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 22/25] powerpc: Remove CONFIG_GENERIC_NVRAM and adopt CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NVRAM_OPS Finn Thain
2019-01-03  8:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-03 22:11     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 19/25] powerpc, fbdev: Use NV_CMODE and NV_VMODE only when CONFIG_PPC32 && CONFIG_PPC_PMAC && CONFIG_NVRAM Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 20/25] powerpc, fbdev: Use arch_nvram_ops methods instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram_write_byte() Finn Thain
2018-12-29 17:02   ` LEROY Christophe
2018-12-29 23:43     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-31 12:29       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-01-01  1:10         ` Finn Thain
2019-01-05 23:06       ` Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 11/25] m68k/mac: Use macros for RTC accesses not magic numbers Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 04/25] char/nvram: Re-order functions to remove forward declarations and #ifdefs Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 14/25] char/nvram: Add "devname:nvram" module alias Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 21/25] nvram: Drop nvram_* symbol exports and prototypes Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 23/25] char/generic_nvram: Remove as unused Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 13/25] m68k: Dispatch nvram_ops calls to Atari or Mac functions Finn Thain
2018-12-29 22:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-30  7:26     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-30 17:53       ` LEROY Christophe
2018-12-30 22:12         ` Finn Thain
2018-12-31 12:19           ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 15/25] powerpc: Clean up nvram includes Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 02/25] m68k/atari: Move Atari-specific code out of drivers/char/nvram.c Finn Thain
2018-12-28 16:51   ` LEROY Christophe
2018-12-29  1:16     ` Finn Thain
2019-01-02 22:29       ` Finn Thain [this message]
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 03/25] m68k/atari: Replace nvram_{read,write}_byte with arch_nvram_ops Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 08/25] char/nvram: Implement NVRAM read/write methods Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 25/25] powerpc: Remove pmac_xpram_{read,write} functions Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 17/25] powerpc: Implement arch_nvram_ops.get_size() and remove old nvram_* exports Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 06/25] x86/thinkpad_acpi: Use arch_nvram_ops methods instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram_write_byte() Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 12/25] m68k/mac: Fix PRAM accessors Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 10/25] m68k/mac: Adopt naming and calling conventions for PRAM routines Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 16/25] powerpc: Add missing ppc_md.nvram_size for CHRP and PowerMac Finn Thain
2018-12-26  0:37 ` [PATCH v8 05/25] char/nvram: Adopt arch_nvram_ops Finn Thain
2019-01-03  8:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-03 22:08     ` Finn Thain
2019-01-04 17:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-01-04 22:05         ` Finn Thain
2018-12-29 22:45 ` [PATCH v8 00/25] Re-use nvram module Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-30  0:09   ` Finn Thain
2018-12-30  4:05     ` Finn Thain
2018-12-31 12:22       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-12-31 22:54       ` Finn Thain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.21.1901021542310.609@nippy.intranet \
    --to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).