From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next ppc64: RCU mods cause __might_sleep BUGs
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:10:06 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1204302142310.27208@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335832418.20866.95.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, 1 May 2012, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 15:37 -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/pagemap.h:354
> > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 6886, name: cc1
>
> Hrm ... in_atomic and irqs_disabled are both 0 ... so yeah it smells
> like a preempt count problem... odd.
>
> Did you get a specific bisect target yet ?
Oh, I went as far as we need, I think, but I didn't bother quite to
complete it because, once in that area, we know the schedule_tail()
omission would muddy the waters: the tail of my bisect log was
# bad: [e798cf3385d3aa7c84afa65677eb92e0c0876dfd] rcu: Add exports for per-CPU variables used for inlining
git bisect bad e798cf3385d3aa7c84afa65677eb92e0c0876dfd
# good: [90aec3b06194393c909e3e5a47b6ed99bb8caba5] rcu: Make exit_rcu() more precise and consolidate
git bisect good 90aec3b06194393c909e3e5a47b6ed99bb8caba5
from which I concluded that the patch responsible is
commit ab8fc41a8545d40a4b58d745876c125af72a8a5c
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Date: Fri Apr 13 14:32:01 2012 -0700
rcu: Move __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock() to per-CPU variables
This commit is another step towards inlinable __rcu_read_lock() and
__rcu_read_unlock() functions for preemptible RCU. This keeps these two
functions out of line, but switches them to use the per-CPU variables
that are required to export their definitions without requiring that
all RCU users include sched.h. These per-CPU variables are saved and
restored at context-switch time.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> > Call Trace:
> > [c0000001a99f78e0] [c00000000000f34c] .show_stack+0x6c/0x16c (unreliable)
> > [c0000001a99f7990] [c000000000077b40] .__might_sleep+0x11c/0x134
> > [c0000001a99f7a10] [c0000000000c6228] .filemap_fault+0x1fc/0x494
> > [c0000001a99f7af0] [c0000000000e7c9c] .__do_fault+0x120/0x684
> > [c0000001a99f7c00] [c000000000025790] .do_page_fault+0x458/0x664
> > [c0000001a99f7e30] [c000000000005868] handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30
> >
> > I've plenty more examples, most of them from page faults or from kswapd;
> > but I don't think there's any more useful information in them.
> >
> > Anything I can try later on?
I'd forgotten about CONFIG_PROVE_RCU (and hadn't been using PROVE_LOCKING
on that machine), but following Paul's suggestion have now turned them on.
But not much light shed, I'm afraid. Within minutes it showed a trace
exactly like the one above, but the only thing PROVE_LOCKING and PROVE_RCU
had to say was that we're holding mmap_sem at that point, which is no
surprise and not a problem, just something lockdep is right to note.
That was an isolated occurrence, it continued quietly for maybe 20 minutes,
then output lots to the console screen - but garbled in a way I've not
seen before - the 0s came out just right (or perhaps all the hex digits
were being shown as 0s), but most everything else was grayly unreadable.
Then after a few minutes, spontaneously rebooted.
Perhaps I should remind myself of netdump; but getting the trace above
without complaint from PROVE_RCU tells me that it is not helping.
Hugh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 22:37 linux-next ppc64: RCU mods cause __might_sleep BUGs Hugh Dickins
2012-04-30 23:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 0:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-01 5:10 ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2012-05-01 14:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 21:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 20:25 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-02 20:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-02 21:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 22:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-03 0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-03 0:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 16:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 18:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-07 21:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1204302142310.27208@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox