linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	x86@kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, willy@infradead.org,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: [v6 02/15] x86/mm: setting fields in deferred pages
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:39:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0422e38-a6da-081a-71c5-82a36dd2a5bb@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170811090214.GD30811@dhcp22.suse.cz>

> AFAIU register_page_bootmem_info_node is only about struct pages backing
> pgdat, usemap and memmap. Those should be in reserved memblocks and we
> do not initialize those at later times, they are not relevant to the
> deferred initialization as your changelog suggests so the ordering with
> get_page_bootmem shouldn't matter. Or am I missing something here?

The pages for pgdata, usemap, and memmap are part of reserved, and thus 
getting initialized when free_all_bootmem() is called.

So, we have something like this in mem_init()

register_page_bootmem_info
  register_page_bootmem_info_node
   get_page_bootmem
    .. setting fields here ..
    such as: page->freelist = (void *)type;

free_all_bootmem()
  free_low_memory_core_early()
   for_each_reserved_mem_region()
    reserve_bootmem_region()
     init_reserved_page() <- Only if this is deferred reserved page
      __init_single_pfn()
       __init_single_page()
           memset(0) <-- Loose the set fields here!

memblock does not know about deferred pages, and can be requested to 
allocate physical pages anywhere. So, the reserved pages in memblock can 
be both in non-deferred and deferred part of the memory.

Without deferred pages enabled, by the time register_page_bootmem_info() 
is called every page went through __init_single_page(), but with 
deferred pages enabled, there is scenario where fields can be set before 
pages go through __init_single_page(). This patch fixes it.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-11 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-07 20:38 [v6 00/15] complete deferred page initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 01/15] x86/mm: reserve only exiting low pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11  8:07   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:24     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:40       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:30         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 13:55   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-17 15:37     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 02/15] x86/mm: setting fields in deferred pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11  9:02   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:39     ` Pasha Tatashin [this message]
2017-08-14 11:43       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:32         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 03/15] sparc64/mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 04/15] mm: discard memblock data later Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11  9:32   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11  9:50     ` Mel Gorman
2017-08-11 15:49     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 16:04       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:22         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:36           ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:35             ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 19:00     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:34       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:39         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 13:42           ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 05/15] mm: don't accessed uninitialized struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11  9:37   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:55     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:47       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 13:51         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-17 15:28           ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-17 15:43             ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-15  9:33   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 06/15] sparc64: simplify vmemmap_populate Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 07/15] mm: defining memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_raw Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:39   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:58     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 16:06       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:24         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 08/15] mm: zero struct pages during initialization Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:50   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:03     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 09/15] sparc64: optimized struct page zeroing Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 12:53   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:04     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 10/15] x86/kasan: explicitly zero kasan shadow memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 11/15] arm64/kasan: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-08  9:07   ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 11:49     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-08 12:30       ` Will Deacon
2017-08-08 12:49         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-08 13:15       ` David Laight
2017-08-08 13:30         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 12/15] mm: explicitly zero pagetable memory Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 13/15] mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:04   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:11     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 14/15] mm: optimize early system hash allocations Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:05   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:13     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-07 20:38 ` [v6 15/15] mm: debug for raw alloctor Pavel Tatashin
2017-08-11 13:08   ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 16:18     ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-14 11:50       ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-14 14:01         ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-15  9:36           ` Michal Hocko
2017-08-11  7:58 ` [v6 00/15] complete deferred page initialization Michal Hocko
2017-08-11 15:13   ` Pasha Tatashin
2017-08-11 15:22     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b0422e38-a6da-081a-71c5-82a36dd2a5bb@oracle.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).