From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494B5C433E0 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87E0164F67 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:52:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 87E0164F67 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DvprB1Br9z3cTV for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:52:42 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu (client-ip=93.17.236.30; helo=pegase1.c-s.fr; envelope-from=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu; receiver=) Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dvpqq0TR6z2yjJ for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 19:52:20 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dvpqh2X62z9txd1; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dU0TJnMUe1p4; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dvpqh1dGGz9txd0; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA508B7DA; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id Lti_ytR-jCZn; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636798B7DB; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:16 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix missing declaration of [en/dis]able_kernel_vsx() To: Geert Uytterhoeven References: <8d7d285a027e9d21f5ff7f850fa71a2655b0c4af.1615279170.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:52:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , amd-gfx list , Paul Mackerras , Alex Deucher , linuxppc-dev , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=c3=b6nig?= Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Le 09/03/2021 à 09:45, Geert Uytterhoeven a écrit : > Hi Christophe, > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 9:39 AM Christophe Leroy > wrote: >> Add stub instances of enable_kernel_vsx() and disable_kernel_vsx() >> when CONFIG_VSX is not set, to avoid following build failure. >> >> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.o >> In file included from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dm_services_types.h:29, >> from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dm_services.h:37, >> from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c:27: >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c: In function 'dcn_bw_apply_registry_override': >> ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/os_types.h:64:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'enable_kernel_vsx'; did you mean 'enable_kernel_fp'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 64 | enable_kernel_vsx(); \ >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c:640:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DC_FP_START' >> 640 | DC_FP_START(); >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/os_types.h:75:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'disable_kernel_vsx'; did you mean 'disable_kernel_fp'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> 75 | disable_kernel_vsx(); \ >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.c:676:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DC_FP_END' >> 676 | DC_FP_END(); >> | ^~~~~~~~~ >> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors >> make[5]: *** [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dcn_calcs.o] Error 1 >> >> Fixes: 16a9dea110a6 ("amdgpu: Enable initial DCN support on POWER") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > > Thanks for your patch! > >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/switch_to.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/switch_to.h >> @@ -71,6 +71,16 @@ static inline void disable_kernel_vsx(void) >> { >> msr_check_and_clear(MSR_FP|MSR_VEC|MSR_VSX); >> } >> +#else >> +static inline void enable_kernel_vsx(void) >> +{ >> + BUILD_BUG(); >> +} >> + >> +static inline void disable_kernel_vsx(void) >> +{ >> + BUILD_BUG(); >> +} >> #endif > > I'm wondering how this is any better than the current situation: using > BUILD_BUG() will still cause a build failure? No it won't cause a failure. In drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/os_types.h you have: #define DC_FP_START() { \ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP)) { \ preempt_disable(); \ enable_kernel_vsx(); \ } else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP)) { \ preempt_disable(); \ enable_kernel_altivec(); \ } else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE)) { \ preempt_disable(); \ enable_kernel_fp(); \ } \ When CONFIG_VSX is not selected, cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP) constant folds to 'false' so the call to enable_kernel_vsx() is discarded and the build succeeds. > > What about adding "depends on !POWERPC || VSX" instead, to prevent > the issue from happening in the first place? CONFIG_VSX is not required as pointed by the DC_FP_START() macro above and the matching DC_FP_END() macro. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > Christophe