linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: Fix virt_addr_valid() check
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:01:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b377978c-7953-ba08-c775-f2f991c9932c@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211225120621.13908-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>



Le 25/12/2021 à 13:06, Kefeng Wang a écrit :
> When run ethtool eth0, the BUG occurred,
> 
>    usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object not in SLUB page?! (offset 0, size 1048)!
>    kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99
>    ...
>    usercopy_abort+0x64/0xa0 (unreliable)
>    __check_heap_object+0x168/0x190
>    __check_object_size+0x1a0/0x200
>    dev_ethtool+0x2494/0x2b20
>    dev_ioctl+0x5d0/0x770
>    sock_do_ioctl+0xf0/0x1d0
>    sock_ioctl+0x3ec/0x5a0
>    __se_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x160
>    system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0
>    system_call_common+0xf8/0x200
> 
> The code shows below,
> 
>    data = vzalloc(array_size(gstrings.len, ETH_GSTRING_LEN));
>    copy_to_user(useraddr, data, gstrings.len * ETH_GSTRING_LEN))
> 
> The data is alloced by vmalloc(), virt_addr_valid(ptr) will return true
> on PowerPC64, which leads to the panic.
> 
> As commit 4dd7554a6456 ("powerpc/64: Add VIRTUAL_BUG_ON checks for __va
> and __pa addresses") does, make sure the virt addr above PAGE_OFFSET in
> the virt_addr_valid().

The change done by that commit only applies to PPC64.

The change you are doing applies to both PPC64 and PPC32. Did you verify 
the impact (or should I say the absence of impact) on PPC32 ?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h | 5 ++++-
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> index 254687258f42..300d4c105a3a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -132,7 +132,10 @@ static inline bool pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>   #define virt_to_page(kaddr)	pfn_to_page(virt_to_pfn(kaddr))
>   #define pfn_to_kaddr(pfn)	__va((pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)
>   
> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr)	pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(kaddr))
> +#define virt_addr_valid(vaddr)	({						\
> +	unsigned long _addr = (unsigned long)vaddr;				\
> +	(unsigned long)(_addr) >= PAGE_OFFSET && pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(_addr));	\

_addr is already an 'unsigned long' so you shouldnt need to cast it.

> +})
>   
>   /*
>    * On Book-E parts we need __va to parse the device tree and we can't

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-10  8:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-25 12:06 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Fix kernel BUG in __check_heap_object() on PowerPC64 Kefeng Wang
2021-12-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc: Fix virt_addr_valid() check Kefeng Wang
2022-01-08 11:58   ` Kefeng Wang
2022-01-11  4:37     ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-01-11  6:04       ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-19  1:15         ` Kefeng Wang
2022-01-20  7:31           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-01-20 11:09             ` Kefeng Wang
2022-01-10  8:01   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-12-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: usercopy: Warn vmalloc/module address in check_heap_object() Kefeng Wang
2021-12-26 17:33   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-12-28  4:51     ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b377978c-7953-ba08-c775-f2f991c9932c@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).