From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com (mail-gx0-f19.google.com [209.85.217.19]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B99DDE06 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 02:19:14 +1100 (EST) Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so253gxk.9 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:19:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:19:11 -0600 From: "Matt Sealey" To: "Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik)" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support In-Reply-To: <633A55242A59C7488FAAF5A6850929984B814A@SRVEXC01.sts.saurer.vpn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6393_22614311.1227626351254" References: <633A55242A59C7488FAAF5A6850929984B814A@SRVEXC01.sts.saurer.vpn> Cc: Tim Yamin , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ------=_Part_6393_22614311.1227626351254 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) < hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de> wrote: > Tim, Grant, > > just an info. > > Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a > transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have read > something like that). A restart of FEC don't work. > But no I figured out, if I connect to the other ethernet port of our board > (natsemi) the FEC will awake to life again, if I initiate a new transaction > over natsemi. This seems a little oddly to me. > Hi guys, We tried to get the SUSE guys to push the patch into openSUSE 11.1 release and the tests came back negative here too with regards to FEC support; for some odd reason, it does this; https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445856#c10 There is some weird interaction here, but I can't imagine what it might be. Tim, did you ever see any ethernet problems like this? -- Matt Sealey Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations ------=_Part_6393_22614311.1227626351254 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Lehmann, Hans (Ritter Elektronik) <hans.lehmann@ritter-elektronik.de> wrote:
Tim, Grant,

just an info.

Very often the Bestcomm-FEC crashed without any error logs if I initiate a transaction over FEC and save the file to disk (I rememeber I have read something like that). A restart of FEC don't work.
But no I figured out, if I connect to the other ethernet port of our board (natsemi) the FEC will awake to life again, if I initiate a new transaction over natsemi. This seems a little oddly to me.

Hi guys,

We tried to get the SUSE guys to push the patch into openSUSE 11.1 release and the tests came back negative here too with regards to FEC support; for some odd reason, it does this;

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445856#c10

There is some weird interaction here, but I can't imagine what it might be. Tim, did you ever see any ethernet problems like this?

--
Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations
------=_Part_6393_22614311.1227626351254--