From: Nayna <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>, Philipp Rudo <prudo@redhat.com>,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
buendgen@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 20:50:54 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5e6ec36-a9ec-22f4-be58-28d48bdc38b4@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1637862358.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
On 11/25/21 13:02, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Michael,
>
> This is resend of the KEXEC_SIG patchset.
>
> The first patch is new because it'a a cleanup that does not require any
> change to the module verification code.
>
> The second patch is the only one that is intended to change any
> functionality.
>
> The rest only deduplicates code but I did not receive any review on that
> part so I don't know if it's desirable as implemented.
>
> The first two patches can be applied separately without the rest.
Patch 2 fails to apply on v5.16-rc4. Can you please also include git
tree/branch while posting the patches ?
Secondly, I see that you add the powerpc support in Patch 2 and then
modify it again in Patch 5 after cleanup. Why not add the support for
powerpc after the clean up ? This will reduce some rework and also
probably simplify patches.
Thanks & Regards,
- Nayna
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-09 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 18:02 [PATCH v2 0/6] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] s390/kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature check Michal Suchanek
2021-11-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc/kexec_file: Add KEXEC_SIG support Michal Suchanek
2021-12-09 1:51 ` Nayna
2021-12-09 9:21 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-12-09 21:53 ` Nayna
2021-12-11 23:37 ` Nayna
2021-12-13 0:46 ` Nayna
2021-12-13 18:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature verification Michal Suchanek
2021-11-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] module: strip the signature marker in the verification function Michal Suchanek
2021-12-07 16:11 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] module: Use key_being_used_for for log messages in verify_appended_signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-25 18:02 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] module: Move duplicate mod_check_sig users code to mod_parse_sig Michal Suchanek
2021-12-07 16:10 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-12-13 18:06 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-30 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Heiko Carstens
2021-12-01 2:37 ` Baoquan He
2021-12-01 11:48 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-12-07 16:10 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-12-07 17:32 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-12-08 9:54 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-12-09 1:50 ` Nayna [this message]
2021-12-09 14:57 ` Michal Suchánek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5e6ec36-a9ec-22f4-be58-28d48bdc38b4@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=buendgen@de.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=fllinden@amazon.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prudo@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).