* [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() @ 2026-01-14 7:26 Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-14 8:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 9:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-14 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Andy Lutomirski, Thomas Gleixner, Vincenzo Frascino Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit time types from the kernel and UAPI. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> --- Based on tip/timers/vdso. This was missed in the original vdso_getres_time64() series as powerpc does not use include/vdso/gettime.h. --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 2 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 12 ++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S | 1 + arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c | 6 ++++++ 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h index ab3df12c8d94..8ea397e26ad0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_gettime64(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts, const struct vdso_time_data *vd); int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, const struct vdso_time_data *vd); +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, + const struct vdso_time_data *vd); #endif int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, const struct vdso_time_data *vd); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S index 79c967212444..1c8e51691bf8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres) cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres) +/* + * Exact prototype of clock_getres_time64() + * + * int __kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct __timespec64 *res); + * + */ +#ifndef __powerpc64__ +V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) + cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64 +V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) +#endif + /* * Exact prototype of time() diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S index 72a1012b8a20..3f384a2526ae 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ VERSION __kernel_clock_gettime; __kernel_clock_gettime64; __kernel_clock_getres; + __kernel_clock_getres_time64; __kernel_time; __kernel_get_tbfreq; __kernel_sync_dicache; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c index 6f5167d81af5..3c194e1ab562 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, { return __cvdso_clock_getres_time32_data(vd, clock_id, res); } + +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, + const struct vdso_time_data *vd) +{ + return __cvdso_clock_getres_data(vd, clock_id, res); +} #endif int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, --- base-commit: 0e55e7636697077abceb2301d7d2718d75c34389 change-id: 20260113-vdso-powerpc-align-e8e93664da2b Best regards, -- Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-14 7:26 [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-14 8:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 9:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-14 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh, Madhavan Srinivasan, Michael Ellerman, Nicholas Piggin, Andy Lutomirski, Thomas Gleixner, Vincenzo Frascino Cc: linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel Le 14/01/2026 à 08:26, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) <chleroy@kernel.org> > --- > Based on tip/timers/vdso. > > This was missed in the original vdso_getres_time64() series as powerpc > does not use include/vdso/gettime.h. > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 2 ++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 12 ++++++++++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c | 6 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h > index ab3df12c8d94..8ea397e26ad0 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h > @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_gettime64(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts, > const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, > const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, > + const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > #endif > int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, > const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S > index 79c967212444..1c8e51691bf8 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S > @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres) > cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres > V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres) > > +/* > + * Exact prototype of clock_getres_time64() > + * > + * int __kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct __timespec64 *res); > + * > + */ > +#ifndef __powerpc64__ > +V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) > + cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64 > +V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) > +#endif > + > > /* > * Exact prototype of time() > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S > index 72a1012b8a20..3f384a2526ae 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ VERSION > __kernel_clock_gettime; > __kernel_clock_gettime64; > __kernel_clock_getres; > + __kernel_clock_getres_time64; > __kernel_time; > __kernel_get_tbfreq; > __kernel_sync_dicache; > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c > index 6f5167d81af5..3c194e1ab562 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c > @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, > { > return __cvdso_clock_getres_time32_data(vd, clock_id, res); > } > + > +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, > + const struct vdso_time_data *vd) > +{ > + return __cvdso_clock_getres_data(vd, clock_id, res); > +} > #endif > > int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, > > --- > base-commit: 0e55e7636697077abceb2301d7d2718d75c34389 > change-id: 20260113-vdso-powerpc-align-e8e93664da2b > > Best regards, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-14 7:26 [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-14 8:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 9:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 2026-01-22 9:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 9:53 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Sverdlin, Alexander @ 2026-01-22 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de, npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, chleroy@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, Christophe, On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. > --- > Based on tip/timers/vdso. > > This was missed in the original vdso_getres_time64() series as powerpc > does not use include/vdso/gettime.h. > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 2 ++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 12 ++++++++++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c | 6 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h > index ab3df12c8d94..8ea397e26ad0 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h > @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_gettime64(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts, > const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, > const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, > + const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > #endif > int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, > const struct vdso_time_data *vd); > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S > index 79c967212444..1c8e51691bf8 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S > @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres) > cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres > V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres) > > +/* > + * Exact prototype of clock_getres_time64() > + * > + * int __kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct __timespec64 *res); > + * > + */ > +#ifndef __powerpc64__ > +V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) > + cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64 > +V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) > +#endif > + > > /* > * Exact prototype of time() > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S > index 72a1012b8a20..3f384a2526ae 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S > @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ VERSION > __kernel_clock_gettime; > __kernel_clock_gettime64; > __kernel_clock_getres; > + __kernel_clock_getres_time64; > __kernel_time; > __kernel_get_tbfreq; > __kernel_sync_dicache; > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c > index 6f5167d81af5..3c194e1ab562 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c > @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, > { > return __cvdso_clock_getres_time32_data(vd, clock_id, res); > } > + > +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, > + const struct vdso_time_data *vd) > +{ > + return __cvdso_clock_getres_data(vd, clock_id, res); > +} > #endif > > int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, > > --- > base-commit: 0e55e7636697077abceb2301d7d2718d75c34389 > change-id: 20260113-vdso-powerpc-align-e8e93664da2b > > Best regards, -- Alexander Sverdlin Siemens AG www.siemens.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 9:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander @ 2026-01-22 9:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 10:00 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 2026-01-22 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 9:53 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sverdlin, Alexander Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, chleroy@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexander, On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: > Hi Thomas, Christophe, > > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> > > I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: > > LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 Thanks for the report! > Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? Not immediately, but I'll look into it. > I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. Is this a toolchain from https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ ? Could you also share your configuration? > > --- > > Based on tip/timers/vdso. > > > > This was missed in the original vdso_getres_time64() series as powerpc > > does not use include/vdso/gettime.h. > > --- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 2 ++ > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 12 ++++++++++++ > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S | 1 + > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c | 6 ++++++ > > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) (...) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 9:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 10:00 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 2026-01-22 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Sverdlin, Alexander @ 2026-01-22 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chleroy@kernel.org Thanks for the quick reply, Thomas! On Thu, 2026-01-22 at 10:50 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > > > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > > > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > > > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> > > > > I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: > > > > LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > Thanks for the report! > > > Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? > > Not immediately, but I'll look into it. > > > I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. > > Is this a toolchain from https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ ? It's actually yocto master toolchain as of 6145837147dc2a6d54a221f9cd7fe90d6895ff90 (openembedded-core). > Could you also share your configuration? Do you mean kernel config? I'll send it privately in a minute not to overload the lists... -- Alexander Sverdlin Siemens AG www.siemens.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 9:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 10:00 ` Sverdlin, Alexander @ 2026-01-22 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh, Sverdlin, Alexander Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > Hi Alexander, > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: >> Hi Thomas, Christophe, >> >> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >>> For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a >>> 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of >>> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit >>> time types from the kernel and UAPI. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> >> >> I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: >> >> LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o >> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o >> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o >> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o >> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported >> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > Thanks for the report! > >> Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? > > Not immediately, but I'll look into it. > >> I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. > > Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C03b93d2aa659407b3e5a08de599bb85e%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046722536758587%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=b9WoZvMR2V3RUpOwrJtm6kmXrpnLti%2BeMJ6zpyB%2Fv4k%3D&reserved=0 ? > Could you also share your configuration? I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 I'll investigate Christophe > >>> --- >>> Based on tip/timers/vdso. >>> >>> This was missed in the original vdso_getres_time64() series as powerpc >>> does not use include/vdso/gettime.h. >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 2 ++ >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S | 1 + >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c | 6 ++++++ >>> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > (...) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 10:58 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP), Sverdlin, Alexander Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > > Hi Alexander, > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: > > > Hi Thomas, Christophe, > > > > > > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > > > > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > > > > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > > > > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> > > > > > > I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: > > > > > > LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o > > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o > > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o > > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported > > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? > > > > Not immediately, but I'll look into it. > > > > > I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. > > > > Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C03b93d2aa659407b3e5a08de599bb85e%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046722536758587%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=b9WoZvMR2V3RUpOwrJtm6kmXrpnLti%2BeMJ6zpyB%2Fv4k%3D&reserved=0 ? > > Could you also share your configuration? > > I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too. > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not > supported > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 > > I'll investigate It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization logic. 000007ac <__c_kernel_clock_getres>: ; __c_kernel_clock_getres(): ; arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c:35 ; { 7ac: d0 ff 21 94 stwu 1, -48(1) 7b0: a6 02 08 7c mflr 0 7b4: 30 00 61 39 addi 11, 1, 48 7b8: 34 00 01 90 stw 0, 52(1) 7bc: 01 00 00 48 bl 0x7bc <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x10> 000007bc: R_PPC_REL24 _savegpr_29 7c0: 78 1b 7e 7c mr 30, 3 7c4: 78 2b bd 7c mr 29, 5 7c8: 78 23 9f 7c mr 31, 4 ; lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c:491 ; struct __kernel_timespec ts; 7cc: 10 00 a0 38 li 5, 16 7d0: 00 00 80 38 li 4, 0 7d4: 08 00 61 38 addi 3, 1, 8 7d8: 01 00 00 48 bl 0x7d8 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x2c> 000007d8: R_PPC_REL24 memset ; lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c:494 ; ok = __cvdso_clock_getres_common(vd, clock, &ts); 7dc: 78 f3 c4 7f mr 4, 30 7e0: 78 eb a3 7f mr 3, 29 7e4: 08 00 a1 38 addi 5, 1, 8 7e8: 19 f8 ff 4b bl 0x0 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common> ; lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c:496 (...) Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 10:58 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 11:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh, Sverdlin, Alexander Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 22/01/2026 à 11:49, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >>> Hi Alexander, >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: >>>> Hi Thomas, Christophe, >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >>>>> For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a >>>>> 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of >>>>> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit >>>>> time types from the kernel and UAPI. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> >>>> >>>> I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: >>>> >>>> LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o >>>> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o >>>> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o >>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o >>>> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported >>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 >>> >>> Thanks for the report! >>> >>>> Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? >>> >>> Not immediately, but I'll look into it. >>> >>>> I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. >>> >>> Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C937051154ddf479721f708de59a3e01c%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046757528646789%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qkl4zNfg2j%2F24vZV7nQ7LLDtxG0WbgaJc30kjHQZqpk%3D&reserved=0 ? >>> Could you also share your configuration? >> >> I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + >> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE > > Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too. >> >> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not >> supported >> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: >> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 >> make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 >> >> I'll investigate > > It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the > vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO > fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does > not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization > logic. > Ah, ok. Reminds me commit b91c8c42ffdd ("lib/vdso: Force inlining of __cvdso_clock_gettime_common()") Problem fixed with: diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c index 95df0153f05ab..4399e143d43a5 100644 --- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c +++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static __maybe_unused __kernel_old_time_t __cvdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *time #endif /* VDSO_HAS_TIME */ #ifdef VDSO_HAS_CLOCK_GETRES -static __maybe_unused +static __always_inline bool __cvdso_clock_getres_common(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *res) { Christophe ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 10:58 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 11:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 11:31 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) Cc: Sverdlin, Alexander, npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:58:04AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > > > Le 22/01/2026 à 11:49, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: > > > > > Hi Thomas, Christophe, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > > > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > > > > > > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > > > > > > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > > > > > > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> > > > > > > > > > > I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: > > > > > > > > > > LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o > > > > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o > > > > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o > > > > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > > > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported > > > > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > > > > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > > > > Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? > > > > > > > > Not immediately, but I'll look into it. > > > > > > > > > I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. > > > > > > > > Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C937051154ddf479721f708de59a3e01c%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046757528646789%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qkl4zNfg2j%2F24vZV7nQ7LLDtxG0WbgaJc30kjHQZqpk%3D&reserved=0 ? > > > > Could you also share your configuration? > > > > > > I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + > > > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE > > > > Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too. > > > > > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not > > > supported > > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > > make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 > > > > > > I'll investigate > > > > It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the > > vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO > > fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does > > not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization > > logic. > > > > Ah, ok. > > Reminds me commit b91c8c42ffdd ("lib/vdso: Force inlining of > __cvdso_clock_gettime_common()") Good pointer. > Problem fixed with: > > diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c > index 95df0153f05ab..4399e143d43a5 100644 > --- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c > +++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c > @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static __maybe_unused __kernel_old_time_t > __cvdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *time > #endif /* VDSO_HAS_TIME */ > > #ifdef VDSO_HAS_CLOCK_GETRES > -static __maybe_unused > +static __always_inline > bool __cvdso_clock_getres_common(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, clockid_t > clock, > struct __kernel_timespec *res) > { Do you want to run the measurements for this one, too and submit a fix? This should get us past the immediate breakage. I'll still try to get the stack initialization out of the vDSO. It might bite us at any time in the future. As these options are meant to prevent information leaks and the vDSO has no sensitive information in the first place, we might as well filter them out. Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 11:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 11:31 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 11:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh Cc: Sverdlin, Alexander, npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 22/01/2026 à 12:07, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:58:04AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >> >> >> Le 22/01/2026 à 11:49, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >>>> Hi Thomas, >>>> >>>> Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >>>>> Hi Alexander, >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: >>>>>> Hi Thomas, Christophe, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >>>>>>> For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a >>>>>>> 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of >>>>>>> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit >>>>>>> time types from the kernel and UAPI. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: >>>>>> >>>>>> LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o >>>>>> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >>>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported >>>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >>>>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the report! >>>>> >>>>>> Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? >>>>> >>>>> Not immediately, but I'll look into it. >>>>> >>>>>> I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. >>>>> >>>>> Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C7f1accdfc7ef4d8ea82c08de59a664b8%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046768343248286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7WB%2FCB2ZDhP9bD0GYwEftyRwfDCoRwuQ5uMA98JhfmE%3D&reserved=0 ? >>>>> Could you also share your configuration? >>>> >>>> I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + >>>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE >>> >>> Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too. >>>> >>>> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not >>>> supported >>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: >>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 >>>> make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 >>>> >>>> I'll investigate >>> >>> It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the >>> vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO >>> fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does >>> not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization >>> logic. >>> >> >> Ah, ok. >> >> Reminds me commit b91c8c42ffdd ("lib/vdso: Force inlining of >> __cvdso_clock_gettime_common()") > > Good pointer. > >> Problem fixed with: >> >> diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c >> index 95df0153f05ab..4399e143d43a5 100644 >> --- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c >> +++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c >> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static __maybe_unused __kernel_old_time_t >> __cvdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *time >> #endif /* VDSO_HAS_TIME */ >> >> #ifdef VDSO_HAS_CLOCK_GETRES >> -static __maybe_unused >> +static __always_inline >> bool __cvdso_clock_getres_common(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, clockid_t >> clock, >> struct __kernel_timespec *res) >> { > > Do you want to run the measurements for this one, too and submit a fix? > This should get us past the immediate breakage. I'm travelling at the moment and won't be able to come with measurement before next month. But the performance degradation is obvious. With the fix, the function is stackless: 00000728 <__c_kernel_clock_getres>: 728: 28 03 00 17 cmplwi r3,23 72c: 41 81 00 50 bgt 77c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x54> 730: 81 45 00 04 lwz r10,4(r5) 734: 6d 49 80 00 xoris r9,r10,32768 738: 2c 09 ff ff cmpwi r9,-1 73c: 40 82 00 08 bne 744 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x1c> 740: 3c a5 00 01 addis r5,r5,1 744: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1 748: 7d 29 18 30 slw r9,r9,r3 74c: 71 2a 08 93 andi. r10,r9,2195 750: 41 82 00 18 beq 768 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x40> 754: 81 25 08 c8 lwz r9,2248(r5) 758: 2c 04 00 00 cmpwi r4,0 75c: 40 82 00 40 bne 79c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x74> 760: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 764: 4e 80 00 20 blr 768: 71 2a 00 60 andi. r10,r9,96 76c: 40 82 00 24 bne 790 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x68> 770: 75 29 00 ff andis. r9,r9,255 774: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1 778: 40 82 ff e0 bne 758 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x30> 77c: 38 00 00 f7 li r0,247 780: 44 00 00 02 sc 784: 40 e3 00 08 bns+ 78c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x64> 788: 7c 63 00 d0 neg r3,r3 78c: 4e 80 00 20 blr 790: 3d 20 00 0f lis r9,15 794: 61 29 42 40 ori r9,r9,16960 798: 4b ff ff c0 b 758 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x30> 79c: 39 40 00 00 li r10,0 7a0: 91 24 00 04 stw r9,4(r4) 7a4: 91 44 00 00 stw r10,0(r4) 7a8: 4b ff ff b8 b 760 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x38> Without the fix, see below, __c_kernel_clock_getres() has to setup a stack in order to call __cvdso_clock_getres_common(), and in addition we see that __cvdso_clock_getres_common() is more or less the same size as __c_kernel_clock_getres() above, so time increase unquestionable. 00000000 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common>: 0: 28 04 00 17 cmplwi r4,23 4: 41 81 00 8c bgt 90 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x90> 8: 81 43 00 04 lwz r10,4(r3) c: 6d 49 80 00 xoris r9,r10,32768 10: 2c 09 ff ff cmpwi r9,-1 14: 40 82 00 08 bne 1c <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x1c> 18: 3c 63 00 01 addis r3,r3,1 1c: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1 20: 7d 24 20 30 slw r4,r9,r4 24: 70 89 08 93 andi. r9,r4,2195 28: 41 82 00 34 beq 5c <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x5c> 2c: 81 23 08 c8 lwz r9,2248(r3) 30: 39 40 00 00 li r10,0 34: 2c 05 00 00 cmpwi r5,0 38: 41 82 00 1c beq 54 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x54> 3c: 38 c0 00 00 li r6,0 40: 38 e0 00 00 li r7,0 44: 91 45 00 08 stw r10,8(r5) 48: 91 25 00 0c stw r9,12(r5) 4c: 90 c5 00 00 stw r6,0(r5) 50: 90 e5 00 04 stw r7,4(r5) 54: 38 60 00 01 li r3,1 58: 48 00 00 20 b 78 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x78> 5c: 70 89 00 60 andi. r9,r4,96 60: 40 82 00 20 bne 80 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x80> 64: 74 84 00 ff andis. r4,r4,255 68: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 6c: 39 40 00 00 li r10,0 70: 39 20 00 01 li r9,1 74: 40 82 ff c0 bne 34 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x34> 78: 54 63 07 fe clrlwi r3,r3,31 7c: 4e 80 00 20 blr 80: 3d 20 00 0f lis r9,15 84: 39 40 00 00 li r10,0 88: 61 29 42 40 ori r9,r9,16960 8c: 4b ff ff a8 b 34 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x34> 90: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 94: 4b ff ff e4 b 78 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common+0x78> 000007c0 <__c_kernel_clock_getres>: 7c0: 94 21 ff d0 stwu r1,-48(r1) 7c4: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0 7c8: bf a1 00 24 stmw r29,36(r1) 7cc: 7c 7e 1b 78 mr r30,r3 7d0: 7c bd 2b 78 mr r29,r5 7d4: 7c 9f 23 78 mr r31,r4 7d8: 38 a0 00 10 li r5,16 7dc: 90 01 00 34 stw r0,52(r1) 7e0: 38 80 00 00 li r4,0 7e4: 38 61 00 08 addi r3,r1,8 7e8: 48 00 00 01 bl 7e8 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x28> 7e8: R_PPC_REL24 memset 7ec: 7f c4 f3 78 mr r4,r30 7f0: 7f a3 eb 78 mr r3,r29 7f4: 38 a1 00 08 addi r5,r1,8 7f8: 4b ff f8 09 bl 0 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common> 7fc: 2c 03 00 00 cmpwi r3,0 800: 40 82 00 24 bne 824 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x64> 804: 38 00 00 f7 li r0,247 808: 7f c3 f3 78 mr r3,r30 80c: 7f e4 fb 78 mr r4,r31 810: 44 00 00 02 sc 814: 40 e3 00 08 bns+ 81c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x5c> 818: 7c 63 00 d0 neg r3,r3 81c: 39 61 00 30 addi r11,r1,48 820: 48 00 00 00 b 820 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x60> 820: R_PPC_REL24 _restgpr_29_x 824: 2c 1f 00 00 cmpwi r31,0 828: 41 82 00 14 beq 83c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x7c> 82c: 81 21 00 0c lwz r9,12(r1) 830: 91 3f 00 00 stw r9,0(r31) 834: 81 21 00 14 lwz r9,20(r1) 838: 91 3f 00 04 stw r9,4(r31) 83c: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 840: 4b ff ff dc b 81c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x5c> > > I'll still try to get the stack initialization out of the vDSO. > It might bite us at any time in the future. As these options are meant > to prevent information leaks and the vDSO has no sensitive information in > the first place, we might as well filter them out. Well, from the first day we converted powerpc to C time vdso, we've done our best in order to keep vdso stackless. So I'm not sure it is worth dealing with the above. Indeed if keeping it as is helps us detect everytime a change jeoperdises the stackless approach, that's not bad. Christophe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 11:31 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 11:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) Cc: Sverdlin, Alexander, npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 12:31:32PM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > Le 22/01/2026 à 12:07, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:58:04AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > > > > > > > > > Le 22/01/2026 à 11:49, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: > > > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > > > > > > > Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > > > > > > Hi Alexander, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Thomas, Christophe, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > > > > > > For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a > > > > > > > > 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of > > > > > > > > CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit > > > > > > > > time types from the kernel and UAPI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o > > > > > > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > > > > > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported > > > > > > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > > > > > > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the report! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? > > > > > > > > > > > > Not immediately, but I'll look into it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C7f1accdfc7ef4d8ea82c08de59a664b8%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046768343248286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7WB%2FCB2ZDhP9bD0GYwEftyRwfDCoRwuQ5uMA98JhfmE%3D&reserved=0 ? > > > > > > Could you also share your configuration? > > > > > > > > > > I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + > > > > > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE > > > > > > > > Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too. > > > > > > > > > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > > > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not > > > > > supported > > > > > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: > > > > > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > > > > > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > > > > make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 > > > > > > > > > > I'll investigate > > > > > > > > It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the > > > > vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO > > > > fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does > > > > not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization > > > > logic. > > > > > > > > > > Ah, ok. > > > > > > Reminds me commit b91c8c42ffdd ("lib/vdso: Force inlining of > > > __cvdso_clock_gettime_common()") > > > > Good pointer. > > > > > Problem fixed with: > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c > > > index 95df0153f05ab..4399e143d43a5 100644 > > > --- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c > > > +++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c > > > @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static __maybe_unused __kernel_old_time_t > > > __cvdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *time > > > #endif /* VDSO_HAS_TIME */ > > > > > > #ifdef VDSO_HAS_CLOCK_GETRES > > > -static __maybe_unused > > > +static __always_inline > > > bool __cvdso_clock_getres_common(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, clockid_t > > > clock, > > > struct __kernel_timespec *res) > > > { > > > > Do you want to run the measurements for this one, too and submit a fix? > > This should get us past the immediate breakage. > > I'm travelling at the moment and won't be able to come with measurement > before next month. But the performance degradation is obvious. Ack, then I'll send a patch. Thanks for all the information. > With the fix, the function is stackless: (...) > Without the fix, see below, __c_kernel_clock_getres() has to setup a stack > in order to call __cvdso_clock_getres_common(), and in addition we see that > __cvdso_clock_getres_common() is more or less the same size as > __c_kernel_clock_getres() above, so time increase unquestionable. (...) > > I'll still try to get the stack initialization out of the vDSO. > > It might bite us at any time in the future. As these options are meant > > to prevent information leaks and the vDSO has no sensitive information in > > the first place, we might as well filter them out. > > Well, from the first day we converted powerpc to C time vdso, we've done our > best in order to keep vdso stackless. So I'm not sure it is worth dealing > with the above. Indeed if keeping it as is helps us detect everytime a > change jeoperdises the stackless approach, that's not bad. I was not aware about the stacklessness. Then this should be reason enough. We should get a better system to detect these additional stacks though. I'll think about it a bit more. Note: -finline-stringops=memset would also avoid the issues. Thomas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 11:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh Cc: Sverdlin, Alexander, npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 22/01/2026 à 12:41, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 12:31:32PM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >> Le 22/01/2026 à 12:07, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:58:04AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 22/01/2026 à 11:49, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:27:43AM +0100, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) wrote: >>>>>> Hi Thomas, >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >>>>>>> Hi Alexander, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 09:39:09AM +0000, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Thomas, Christophe, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >>>>>>>>> For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a >>>>>>>>> 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of >>>>>>>>> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit >>>>>>>>> time types from the kernel and UAPI. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o >>>>>>>> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >>>>>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported >>>>>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for the report! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not immediately, but I'll look into it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this a toolchain from https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Ftools%2Fcrosstool%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7Cbd6434eab4334cea44fe08de59ab274e%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639046788822130060%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=K7PlfBLHdNEBRgsPQ5aNBgu2v8DqDrhmzwoHrcOc5s8%3D&reserved=0 ? >>>>>>> Could you also share your configuration? >>>>>> >>>>>> I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + >>>>>> CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the hint, no I can reproduce it, too. >>>>>> >>>>>> VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg >>>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not >>>>>> supported >>>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: >>>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 >>>>>> make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 >>>>>> make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll investigate >>>>> >>>>> It seems the compiler decides to call memset(), which is not valid from the >>>>> vDSO. We are are using -ffreestanding. Disabling CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO >>>>> fixes the issue. So I guess we should a) figure out why -ffreestanding does >>>>> not seem to work here and b) exclude the vDSO from the stack initialization >>>>> logic. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ah, ok. >>>> >>>> Reminds me commit b91c8c42ffdd ("lib/vdso: Force inlining of >>>> __cvdso_clock_gettime_common()") >>> >>> Good pointer. >>> >>>> Problem fixed with: >>>> >>>> diff --git a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c >>>> index 95df0153f05ab..4399e143d43a5 100644 >>>> --- a/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c >>>> +++ b/lib/vdso/gettimeofday.c >>>> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static __maybe_unused __kernel_old_time_t >>>> __cvdso_time(__kernel_old_time_t *time >>>> #endif /* VDSO_HAS_TIME */ >>>> >>>> #ifdef VDSO_HAS_CLOCK_GETRES >>>> -static __maybe_unused >>>> +static __always_inline >>>> bool __cvdso_clock_getres_common(const struct vdso_time_data *vd, clockid_t >>>> clock, >>>> struct __kernel_timespec *res) >>>> { >>> >>> Do you want to run the measurements for this one, too and submit a fix? >>> This should get us past the immediate breakage. >> >> I'm travelling at the moment and won't be able to come with measurement >> before next month. But the performance degradation is obvious. > > Ack, then I'll send a patch. Thanks for all the information. > >> With the fix, the function is stackless: > > (...) > >> Without the fix, see below, __c_kernel_clock_getres() has to setup a stack >> in order to call __cvdso_clock_getres_common(), and in addition we see that >> __cvdso_clock_getres_common() is more or less the same size as >> __c_kernel_clock_getres() above, so time increase unquestionable. > > (...) > >>> I'll still try to get the stack initialization out of the vDSO. >>> It might bite us at any time in the future. As these options are meant >>> to prevent information leaks and the vDSO has no sensitive information in >>> the first place, we might as well filter them out. >> >> Well, from the first day we converted powerpc to C time vdso, we've done our >> best in order to keep vdso stackless. So I'm not sure it is worth dealing >> with the above. Indeed if keeping it as is helps us detect everytime a >> change jeoperdises the stackless approach, that's not bad. > > I was not aware about the stacklessness. Then this should be reason enough. > We should get a better system to detect these additional stacks though. > I'll think about it a bit more. Well, that's only a "best effort", at the end we don't success in all cases, refer commit 08c18b63d965 ("powerpc/vdso32: Add missing _restgpr_31_x to fix build failure"), there are not enough volatile registers for __c_kernel_clock_gettime(), part of this function sets up a stack frame to save one non-volatile register and use it. But at least for time we can keep flat functions that don't have to suffer the overcost of saving volatile registers for calling subfunctions. For __c_kernel_getrandom() that's different because it has to call __arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack() so a stack frame is definitely needed but at least we also avoid there to have multiple sub-function calls. Christophe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Weißschuh, Sverdlin, Alexander Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Again, Le 22/01/2026 à 11:27, Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) a écrit : > Hi Thomas, > > Le 22/01/2026 à 10:50, Thomas Weißschuh a écrit : >> Hi Alexander, >> Could you also share your configuration? > > I've just been able to reproduce it with ppc64_defconfig + > CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE > > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not > supported > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/ > vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 > Comes from here, a call to memset(): 000007c0 <__c_kernel_clock_getres>: 7c0: 94 21 ff d0 stwu r1,-48(r1) 7c4: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0 7c8: bf a1 00 24 stmw r29,36(r1) 7cc: 7c 7e 1b 78 mr r30,r3 7d0: 7c bd 2b 78 mr r29,r5 7d4: 7c 9f 23 78 mr r31,r4 7d8: 38 a0 00 10 li r5,16 7dc: 90 01 00 34 stw r0,52(r1) 7e0: 38 80 00 00 li r4,0 7e4: 38 61 00 08 addi r3,r1,8 7e8: 48 00 00 01 bl 7e8 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x28> 7e8: R_PPC_REL24 memset 7ec: 7f c4 f3 78 mr r4,r30 7f0: 7f a3 eb 78 mr r3,r29 7f4: 38 a1 00 08 addi r5,r1,8 7f8: 4b ff f8 09 bl 0 <__cvdso_clock_getres_common> 7fc: 2c 03 00 00 cmpwi r3,0 800: 40 82 00 24 bne 824 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x64> 804: 38 00 00 f7 li r0,247 808: 7f c3 f3 78 mr r3,r30 80c: 7f e4 fb 78 mr r4,r31 810: 44 00 00 02 sc 814: 40 e3 00 08 bns+ 81c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x5c> 818: 7c 63 00 d0 neg r3,r3 81c: 39 61 00 30 addi r11,r1,48 820: 48 00 00 00 b 820 <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x60> 820: R_PPC_REL24 _restgpr_29_x 824: 2c 1f 00 00 cmpwi r31,0 828: 41 82 00 14 beq 83c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x7c> 82c: 81 21 00 0c lwz r9,12(r1) 830: 91 3f 00 00 stw r9,0(r31) 834: 81 21 00 14 lwz r9,20(r1) 838: 91 3f 00 04 stw r9,4(r31) 83c: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0 840: 4b ff ff dc b 81c <__c_kernel_clock_getres+0x5c> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() 2026-01-22 9:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 2026-01-22 9:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh @ 2026-01-22 9:53 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) @ 2026-01-22 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sverdlin, Alexander, thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de, npiggin@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, chleroy@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexandre, Le 22/01/2026 à 10:39, Sverdlin, Alexander a écrit : > Hi Thomas, Christophe, > > On Wed, 2026-01-14 at 08:26 +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: >> For consistency with __vdso_clock_gettime64() there should also be a >> 64-bit variant of clock_getres(). This will allow the extension of >> CONFIG_COMPAT_32BIT_TIME to the vDSO and finally the removal of 32-bit >> time types from the kernel and UAPI. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> > > I've bisected this patch to cause the following build failure on my side: > > LDS arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/sigtramp32-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/datapage-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/cacheflush-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/note-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getcpu-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/getrandom-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-chacha-32.o > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday-32.o > VDSO32C arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgetrandom-32.o > VDSO32A arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/crtsavres-32.o > VDSO32L arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg > arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg: dynamic relocations are not supported > make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/Makefile:79: arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.so.dbg] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/powerpc/Makefile:388: vdso_prepare] Error 2 > > Does it ring any bells? What could I try/test? > > I'm using gcc-15.2.0 and binutils 2.45.1. Can you share your defconfig ? I don't have such a problem with mpc885_ads_defconfig using same gcc/binutils as you. Christophe > >> --- >> Based on tip/timers/vdso. >> >> This was missed in the original vdso_getres_time64() series as powerpc >> does not use include/vdso/gettime.h. >> --- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h | 2 ++ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S | 12 ++++++++++++ >> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S | 1 + >> arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c | 6 ++++++ >> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h >> index ab3df12c8d94..8ea397e26ad0 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h >> @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_gettime64(clockid_t clock, struct __kernel_timespec *ts, >> const struct vdso_time_data *vd); >> int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, >> const struct vdso_time_data *vd); >> +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, >> + const struct vdso_time_data *vd); >> #endif >> int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, >> const struct vdso_time_data *vd); >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S >> index 79c967212444..1c8e51691bf8 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/gettimeofday.S >> @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres) >> cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres >> V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres) >> >> +/* >> + * Exact prototype of clock_getres_time64() >> + * >> + * int __kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct __timespec64 *res); >> + * >> + */ >> +#ifndef __powerpc64__ >> +V_FUNCTION_BEGIN(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) >> + cvdso_call __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64 >> +V_FUNCTION_END(__kernel_clock_getres_time64) >> +#endif >> + >> >> /* >> * Exact prototype of time() >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S >> index 72a1012b8a20..3f384a2526ae 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vdso32.lds.S >> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ VERSION >> __kernel_clock_gettime; >> __kernel_clock_gettime64; >> __kernel_clock_getres; >> + __kernel_clock_getres_time64; >> __kernel_time; >> __kernel_get_tbfreq; >> __kernel_sync_dicache; >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c >> index 6f5167d81af5..3c194e1ab562 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.c >> @@ -35,6 +35,12 @@ int __c_kernel_clock_getres(clockid_t clock_id, struct old_timespec32 *res, >> { >> return __cvdso_clock_getres_time32_data(vd, clock_id, res); >> } >> + >> +int __c_kernel_clock_getres_time64(clockid_t clock_id, struct __kernel_timespec *res, >> + const struct vdso_time_data *vd) >> +{ >> + return __cvdso_clock_getres_data(vd, clock_id, res); >> +} >> #endif >> >> int __c_kernel_gettimeofday(struct __kernel_old_timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz, >> >> --- >> base-commit: 0e55e7636697077abceb2301d7d2718d75c34389 >> change-id: 20260113-vdso-powerpc-align-e8e93664da2b >> >> Best regards, > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-22 13:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-01-14 7:26 [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Provide clock_getres_time64() Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-14 8:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 9:39 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 2026-01-22 9:50 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 10:00 ` Sverdlin, Alexander 2026-01-22 10:27 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 10:58 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 11:07 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 11:31 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 11:41 ` Thomas Weißschuh 2026-01-22 13:30 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 10:49 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) 2026-01-22 9:53 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox