From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macintosh/via-pmu: Fix compiler warnings when CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:11:47 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6d69a6-9e17-d370-a1cd-8f51204ea5d@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <073c34e0-a016-cf70-1deb-be286da94bde@csgroup.eu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 21/03/2022 à 09:50, Finn Thain a écrit :
> > Hi Christophe,
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Finn Thain wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>> Le 19/03/2022 à 08:20, Finn Thain a écrit :
> >>>> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:897:12: warning: 'pmu_battery_proc_show' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >>>> static int pmu_battery_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:871:12: warning: 'pmu_irqstats_proc_show' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >>>> static int pmu_irqstats_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:860:12: warning: 'pmu_info_proc_show' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >>>> static int pmu_info_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> >>>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>>>
> >>>> Rearrange some code and add some #ifdefs to avoid unused code warnings
> >>>> when CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled.
> >>>
> >>> Why not just put those three functions inside an #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> You'd get a warning about the prototypes ("declared static but never
> >> defined"). Rather than add an ifdef around the prototypes as well, I
> >> just reordered things a little.
> >
> > Oops, I was forgetting that I also added an ifdef around the new
> > prototype.
> >
> > The simplest solution is probably the patch below, as it better exploits
> > the stubbed-out proc_* API in include/linux/proc_fs.h.
> >
> > Was this what you had in mind?
>
> Yes that's exactly what I had in mind.
>
OK, I'll submit it formally.
Thanks for your review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-19 7:20 [PATCH] macintosh/via-pmu: Fix compiler warnings when CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled Finn Thain
2022-03-19 15:26 ` Randy Dunlap
2022-03-21 6:42 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 8:33 ` Finn Thain
2022-03-21 8:50 ` Finn Thain
2022-03-21 8:56 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 9:11 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2022-03-21 8:55 ` Christophe Leroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6d69a6-9e17-d370-a1cd-8f51204ea5d@linux-m68k.org \
--to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox