From: david.hagood@gmail.com
To: "Scott Wood" <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@windriver.com>,
david.hagood@gmail.com,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Questions on interrupt vector assignment on MPC8641D
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:44:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7e849f04892d41d865b6b38a92cc322.squirrel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101014125010.5cfb4ee5@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net>
> Well, it was a coworker who added the workaround, so I assume we're
> already aware of the issue.
>
> The description of NIRQ is vague enough that it's hard to argue that
> Linux's expectations of what it means are justified.
>
Well, I now can actually interrupt the PPC from my host processor!
(well, it segfaulted, but's my fault for not actually initializing my work
queue structure. But I can get the interrupt into the part!)
So thanks to all.
I hope to get my code working, get past my delivery deadline on it, clean
it up so it matches The One True Way Of Laying Out Kernel Code, and post
it here for everybody to point and laugh at. Maybe around Christmas.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-14 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-21 14:12 Questions on interrupt vector assignment on MPC8641D david.hagood
2010-09-21 21:37 ` Anderson, Trevor
2010-09-21 22:07 ` Scott Wood
2010-09-22 0:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2010-10-07 20:12 ` david.hagood
2010-10-07 20:26 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-07 21:01 ` david.hagood
2010-10-09 15:52 ` david.hagood
2010-10-11 9:51 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-11 11:30 ` David Hagood
2010-10-11 14:44 ` david.hagood
2010-10-13 1:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-10-11 15:51 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 1:39 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-11 15:50 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-11 17:02 ` david.hagood
2010-10-11 17:30 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 3:11 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-09 17:03 ` david.hagood
2010-10-11 9:55 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-11 17:17 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-12 20:55 ` david.hagood
2010-10-12 21:21 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13 1:17 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-13 15:28 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13 17:08 ` david.hagood
2010-10-13 19:56 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-13 21:16 ` david.hagood
2010-10-14 1:39 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-14 3:27 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-14 15:51 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-14 16:22 ` david.hagood
2010-10-14 16:32 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-14 17:20 ` david.hagood
2010-10-14 17:50 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-14 18:44 ` david.hagood [this message]
2010-10-15 1:28 ` tiejun.chen
2010-10-12 3:00 ` tiejun.chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7e849f04892d41d865b6b38a92cc322.squirrel@localhost \
--to=david.hagood@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=tiejun.chen@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).