From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050812041443.GC3187@smtp.west.cox.net>
References: <c237b7e878e0c32f421209fa37b7a156@freescale.com>
	<20050811195927.GX3187@smtp.west.cox.net>
	<17148.7234.193140.997481@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
	<20050812041443.GC3187@smtp.west.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Message-Id: <b91e6160d8ae8d65e236ae65958540e9@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:25:18 +0200
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

> Ok.  How about 9xx/ instead of classic64 ?

That would be tons better, as there doesn't exist anything
called "classic64"...


Segher