linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace: Cleanup duplicate macro definitions
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:39:17 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbde8e05-fc85-434e-998c-a6fcc8b2df4e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ldwf520w.fsf@gmail.com>



On 12/16/24 4:27 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>> Both core-pkey.c and ptrace-pkey.c tests have similar macro
>> definitions, move them to "pkeys.h" and remove the macro
>> definitions from the C file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h      | 8 ++++++++
>>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c   | 8 --------
>>  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c | 8 --------
>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
>> index 51729d9a7111..3a0129467de6 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
>> @@ -35,10 +35,18 @@
>>  #define __NR_pkey_alloc		384
>>  #define __NR_pkey_free		385
>>  
>> +#ifndef NT_PPC_PKEY
>> +#define NT_PPC_PKEY		0x110
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  #define PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY	2
>>  #define NR_PKEYS		32
>>  #define PKEY_BITS_MASK		((1UL << PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY) - 1)
>>  
>> +#define AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> +#define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>> +#define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey + 1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>> +
>>  inline unsigned long pkeyreg_get(void)
>>  {
>>  	return mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> index 31c9bf6d95db..f8ff05e5bf6e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> @@ -18,18 +18,10 @@
>>  #include "child.h"
>>  #include "pkeys.h"
>>  
>> -#ifndef NT_PPC_PKEY
>> -#define NT_PPC_PKEY		0x110
>> -#endif
>> -
>>  #ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
>>  #define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE	0x4
>>  #endif
> 
> We could remove this as well right. Since pkeys.h already has this
> permission defines i.e.
> PKEY_DISABLE_[ACCESS|WRITE|EXECUTE] 
> 

Nice catch. Yes we can drop these too.
Will fix and send a v2
 

>>  
>> -#define AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> -#define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>> -#define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey + 1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>> -
>>  #define CORE_FILE_LIMIT	(5 * 1024 * 1024)	/* 5 MB should be enough */
>>  
>>  static const char core_pattern_file[] = "/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern";
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c
>> index 6893ed096457..5d528d0ea9d1 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c
>> @@ -9,18 +9,10 @@
>>  #include "child.h"
>>  #include "pkeys.h"
>>  
>> -#ifndef NT_PPC_PKEY
>> -#define NT_PPC_PKEY		0x110
>> -#endif
>> -
>>  #ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
>>  #define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE	0x4
>>  #endif
>>  
> 
> Same here. This can be cleaned up, no? Since pkeys already has this defined.
> 
> 
> -ritesh
> 
>> -#define AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> -#define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>> -#define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey + 1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>> -
>>  static const char user_read[] = "[User Read (Running)]";
>>  static const char user_write[] = "[User Write (Running)]";
>>  static const char ptrace_read_running[] = "[Ptrace Read (Running)]";
>> -- 
>> 2.47.0



  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-16 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-09 15:14 [PATCH 1/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey: Remove duplicate macros Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey: " Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-16 10:54   ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-12-16 12:09     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace: Cleanup duplicate macro definitions Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-16 10:57   ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-12-16 12:09     ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2024-12-16 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey: Remove duplicate macros Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-12-16 12:10   ` Madhavan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bbde8e05-fc85-434e-998c-a6fcc8b2df4e@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).