From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, naveen@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace: Cleanup duplicate macro definitions
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:39:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbde8e05-fc85-434e-998c-a6fcc8b2df4e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ldwf520w.fsf@gmail.com>
On 12/16/24 4:27 PM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> Both core-pkey.c and ptrace-pkey.c tests have similar macro
>> definitions, move them to "pkeys.h" and remove the macro
>> definitions from the C file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h | 8 ++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c | 8 --------
>> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c | 8 --------
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
>> index 51729d9a7111..3a0129467de6 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/include/pkeys.h
>> @@ -35,10 +35,18 @@
>> #define __NR_pkey_alloc 384
>> #define __NR_pkey_free 385
>>
>> +#ifndef NT_PPC_PKEY
>> +#define NT_PPC_PKEY 0x110
>> +#endif
>> +
>> #define PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> #define NR_PKEYS 32
>> #define PKEY_BITS_MASK ((1UL << PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY) - 1)
>>
>> +#define AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> +#define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>> +#define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey + 1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>> +
>> inline unsigned long pkeyreg_get(void)
>> {
>> return mfspr(SPRN_AMR);
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> index 31c9bf6d95db..f8ff05e5bf6e 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> @@ -18,18 +18,10 @@
>> #include "child.h"
>> #include "pkeys.h"
>>
>> -#ifndef NT_PPC_PKEY
>> -#define NT_PPC_PKEY 0x110
>> -#endif
>> -
>> #ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
>> #define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE 0x4
>> #endif
>
> We could remove this as well right. Since pkeys.h already has this
> permission defines i.e.
> PKEY_DISABLE_[ACCESS|WRITE|EXECUTE]
>
Nice catch. Yes we can drop these too.
Will fix and send a v2
>>
>> -#define AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> -#define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>> -#define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey + 1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>> -
>> #define CORE_FILE_LIMIT (5 * 1024 * 1024) /* 5 MB should be enough */
>>
>> static const char core_pattern_file[] = "/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern";
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c
>> index 6893ed096457..5d528d0ea9d1 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey.c
>> @@ -9,18 +9,10 @@
>> #include "child.h"
>> #include "pkeys.h"
>>
>> -#ifndef NT_PPC_PKEY
>> -#define NT_PPC_PKEY 0x110
>> -#endif
>> -
>> #ifndef PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
>> #define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE 0x4
>> #endif
>>
>
> Same here. This can be cleaned up, no? Since pkeys already has this defined.
>
>
> -ritesh
>
>> -#define AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY 2
>> -#define PKEY_REG_BITS (sizeof(u64) * 8)
>> -#define pkeyshift(pkey) (PKEY_REG_BITS - ((pkey + 1) * AMR_BITS_PER_PKEY))
>> -
>> static const char user_read[] = "[User Read (Running)]";
>> static const char user_write[] = "[User Write (Running)]";
>> static const char ptrace_read_running[] = "[Ptrace Read (Running)]";
>> --
>> 2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 15:14 [PATCH 1/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey: Remove duplicate macros Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-pkey: " Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-16 10:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-12-16 12:09 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-09 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace: Cleanup duplicate macro definitions Madhavan Srinivasan
2024-12-16 10:57 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-12-16 12:09 ` Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2024-12-16 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftest/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey: Remove duplicate macros Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2024-12-16 12:10 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbde8e05-fc85-434e-998c-a6fcc8b2df4e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=naveen@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).