From: Aaron Pace <kodiakuppercut@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Non-contiguous physical memory on 8572
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:11:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc81dc640907021311y1395ed15l2d50cebb3749c29f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
I wrote to this list quite some time ago concerning a board that has 2
gigs of ram mapped in at 0x0.0000.0000 - 0x0.7fff.ffff, and a second 2
gigs of ram at 0x1.0000.0000 - 0x1.7fff.ffff. Kumar responded and
mentioned that this wasn't currently supported in the powerpc
architecture. I've had this on my 'curiosity' back burner to take a
look at for some time.
I found a little time to look at this, and what I discovered is that
this seems to actually have been a fairly trivial problem to solve.
I'd like to get some feedback on the method I used, if possible, to
see if I've overlooked something blatantly obvious.
In MMU_init of arch/powerpc/mm/init_32.c, where the current code sets
lmb.memory.cnt to zero, I instead walk through the memory regions and
call lmb_reserve for each chunk of memory that lies in a 'hole'.
There are then some minor fixups to make sure that total_memory and
total_highmem get the right numbers. This small change allows all
four gigabytes of memory to be accessed and used in my tests.
Am I missing something obvious?
Would you like this in a patch for 32 or next, or is there a reason
that this would not be desirable in the powerpc branch?
Thanks,
Aaron
next reply other threads:[~2009-07-02 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-02 20:11 Aaron Pace [this message]
2009-07-02 21:05 ` Non-contiguous physical memory on 8572 Kumar Gala
2009-07-02 21:14 ` Scott Wood
2009-07-02 21:56 ` Aaron Pace
2009-07-06 16:23 ` Scott Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bc81dc640907021311y1395ed15l2d50cebb3749c29f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kodiakuppercut@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox