From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-iw0-f201.google.com (mail-iw0-f201.google.com [209.85.223.201]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2181007D6 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:06:34 +1100 (EST) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so811605iwn.1 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:06:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:06:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Large physical address support on e500 platform From: Aaron Pace To: Kumar Gala Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > Is a simple "hello world" module sufficient to show the issue? =A0I'll lo= ok into it this week. > > - k It wasn't in my situation, unfortunately. To duplicate this, I had one relatively large kernel module, and then one simple 'hello world' module that did nothing more than call an exported function from the first module as part of its init. -Aaron