linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: piliu <piliu@redhat.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] ppc64/kexec_file: avoid stomping memory used by special regions
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 20:53:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc8fe308-5ce9-1ca6-c832-7c3a75a732d2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701074012.GA4496@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>



On 07/01/2020 03:40 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Hari,
> On 06/27/20 at 12:35am, Hari Bathini wrote:
>> crashkernel region could have an overlap with special memory regions
>> like  opal, rtas, tce-table & such. These regions are referred to as
>> exclude memory ranges. Setup this ranges during image probe in order
>> to avoid them while finding the buffer for different kdump segments.
>> Implement kexec_locate_mem_hole_ppc64() that locates a memory hole
>> accounting for these ranges. Also, override arch_kexec_add_buffer()
>> to locate a memory hole & later call __kexec_add_buffer() function
>> with kbuf->mem set to skip the generic locate memory hole lookup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/crashdump-ppc64.h |   10 +
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h           |    7 -
>>  arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c                |    7 +
>>  arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c          |  292 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 312 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/crashdump-ppc64.h
>>
> [snip]
>>  /**
>> + * get_exclude_memory_ranges - Get exclude memory ranges. This list includes
>> + *                             regions like opal/rtas, tce-table, initrd,
>> + *                             kernel, htab which should be avoided while
>> + *                             setting up kexec load segments.
>> + * @mem_ranges:                Range list to add the memory ranges to.
>> + *
>> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
>> + */
>> +static int get_exclude_memory_ranges(struct crash_mem **mem_ranges)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_tce_mem_ranges(mem_ranges);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_initrd_mem_range(mem_ranges);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_htab_mem_range(mem_ranges);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_kernel_mem_range(mem_ranges);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_rtas_mem_range(mem_ranges, false);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_opal_mem_range(mem_ranges, false);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	ret = add_reserved_ranges(mem_ranges);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/* exclude memory ranges should be sorted for easy lookup */
>> +	sort_memory_ranges(*mem_ranges);
>> +out:
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		pr_err("Failed to setup exclude memory ranges\n");
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
> 
> I'm confused about the "overlap with crashkernel memory", does that mean
> those normal kernel used memory could be put in crashkernel reserved
> memory range?  If so why can't just skip those areas while crashkernel
> doing the reservation?
I raised the same question in another mail. As Hari's answer, "kexec -p"
skips these ranges in user space. And the same logic should be done in
"kexec -s -p"

Regards,
Pingfan


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 19:04 [PATCH 00/11] ppc64: enable kdump support for kexec_file_load syscall Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-06-27  6:30   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-28  2:28   ` piliu
2020-06-29  6:00     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29 11:39   ` Petr Tesarik
2020-06-29 11:56     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-01  7:46       ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 18:31         ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-02 11:47           ` Dave Young
2020-06-26 19:04 ` [PATCH 02/11] powerpc/kexec_file: mark PPC64 specific code Hari Bathini
2020-06-27  6:42   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-29  6:23     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/kexec_file: add helper functions for getting memory ranges Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] ppc64/kexec_file: avoid stomping memory used by special regions Hari Bathini
2020-06-28  2:14   ` piliu
2020-06-29  5:55     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-30  3:30       ` piliu
2020-06-30  6:10         ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-30  8:13           ` piliu
2020-07-01  7:40   ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 12:53     ` piliu [this message]
2020-07-02 11:59       ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 18:18     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-02 11:54       ` Dave Young
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] powerpc/drmem: make lmb walk a bit more flexible Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] ppc64/kexec_file: setup the stack for purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] ppc64/kexec_file: setup backup region for kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ppc64/kexec_file: prepare elfcore header for crashing kernel Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] ppc64/kexec_file: add appropriate regions for memory reserve map Hari Bathini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc8fe308-5ce9-1ca6-c832-7c3a75a732d2@redhat.com \
    --to=piliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).