From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95887CC6B27 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4j4NBy6mcqz2ynZ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:30:02 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip="2001:41d0:203:375::fc" ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1791963002; cv=none; b=dQZp1fVXPdTZ+diG92TPLwrhAJsxejZiq5EWf5YxUFzfDJtwx6dwg4OgmETu35Ezrbe2I6WHPIr3fzeTUzxaauyiJNp2u2XMNXLtMuhnYxpTuOrJ9Mny1YGtepdc1nl8ncIZ8C+oY3Y1ZSnzk+lbNOZXw68ZP+Px4CjP4O4uWzrtOry4lPXpj1X9vPeGiKmer8PAsWjth+ZkwJjjCIiCQNyuo2Ge0LsdAoeZVjfV2ynwwxu7FVOGrbp4cGlqlz9PBMdveYsQVEFP+3GBjgr8lj9wh1x5dJkwEldky+3D2g3jorTWq+gGlVKVZx1aJ+OAiJtyDkSQen7U80vHDQWHKw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1791963002; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=sKdAh4DSPDajzvJegyN5GGao4FMUHTTyQLWPRHfK9UI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=kz9TNBONdHI7PJLSHoTzR29FomCAhY9VXOVZlSMTY/7x07yAQjnzO32uMyYqRD0MKm8f5IC0Gq2axiW/uD4Cq2feAiwj6g9rs7Bckmq2MDWHzxRD6wgULfUFEiWfUTKKMpLTJJFEme26VHB7yah7WUGeyhtbJb7z0HfGid9JMsEjrfkQsi3/WEiZUPeApylI1IvhYmbAQtw8xrEHPKZIDSvmJimNrfjKwIDvWJOi8NH3i4dClsrEfiAp0CebJbv7wyt3zRhAQVR7LdvUAHbwPNJVLi/EmML/qe38ZBXlynMl90XzTTSuCGBvSMNP3kW1PtedjTdjgPmGJXBFR5K3VQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=SBFV9XRV; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=2001:41d0:203:375::fc; helo=mta1.migadu.com; envelope-from=hao.ge@linux.dev; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=SBFV9XRV; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev (client-ip=2001:41d0:203:375::fc; helo=mta1.migadu.com; envelope-from=hao.ge@linux.dev; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-252.mta1.migadu.com [IPv6:2001:41d0:203:375::fc]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4j4NBv5TKqz2yYd for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:29:59 +1100 (AEDT) X-Envelope-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=KIpg8DK6yUzBXoPal9V2gzxOahvuwx1OXybBEt4rIgk=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1791962981; v=1; x=1792567781; b=SBFV9XRVzu5cfNcVjTL6/iN3TVt1tW5tz+3rSIMj0r6YVCMBRykNexaHafZKt9EjVUO8uG25 xa2rCOQdoStUF+FM2UAIc0vVoeeJ9bDpENNtxpSopEhfCL5kKA5eanNGbd5/0fFyCR4Vv+FYQ4T ZyaoueHY2Hn+ItyZC21+gTTc= X-Envelope-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Received: by smtp.migadu.com with ESMTPS id d0234dd56ab13b63; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:28:15 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: d0234dd56ab13b63 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 15:29:08 +0800 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/vmalloc: undo partial mappings inside the mapping functions To: Uladzislau Rezki , Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" , Shrikanth Hegde , Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrew Morton , Dennis Zhou , Tejun Heo , Christoph Lameter , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Sashiko References: <20261009063619.112313-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> <20261009063619.112313-3-hao.ge@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Hao Ge In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Uladzislau and Suren On 2026/10/14 00:39, Uladzislau Rezki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 03:23:14PM +0400, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 10:36 AM Hao Ge wrote: >>> >>> __vmap_pages_range_noflush() and friends can install some PTEs before >>> failing and leave them mapped, and the kernel callers do not agree on >>> who cleans them up. pcpu_map_pages() and kmsan_ioremap_page_range() >>> roll back what they mapped before the failure, while >>> vm_module_tags_populate() and the __GFP_NOFAIL retry loop in >>> __vmalloc_area_node() rely on the mapping functions cleaning up and >>> do not call anything like vunmap_range() themselves. When the same >>> range is mapped again, the attempt hits the leftovers and fails, with >>> a BUG() in vmap_pte_range() for huge mappings and a warning on the >>> small-page path. >>> >>> After discussing with Suren and Ulad, we decided to put the rollback >>> into the entry points of the vmap API rather than into every low-level >>> helper. __vmap_pages_range_noflush() undoes the whole range it was >>> asked to map when it fails, and vmap_page_range() undoes its range >>> for the ioremap-style mappings. >>> >>> The rollback is __vunmap_range_noflush(), it only clears the PTEs, >>> no TLB flush, nothing has touched these mappings. >>> vmap_pages_range_noflush() drops the KMSAN metadata when the data >>> mapping fails, and an empty range bails out with -EINVAL now, which >>> used to BUG_ON() on the small-page path and map nothing at all on >>> the huge-page one. >>> >>> Reported-by: Sashiko >>> Suggested-by: Uladyslau Rezki >>> Signed-off-by: Hao Ge >>> --- >>> mm/vmalloc.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c >>> index db669103dc66..e1b376f57dd2 100644 >>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c >>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c >>> @@ -363,6 +363,9 @@ int vmap_page_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >>> if (!err) >>> err = kmsan_ioremap_page_range(addr, end, phys_addr, prot, >>> ioremap_max_page_shift); >>> + if (err) >>> + __vunmap_range_noflush(addr, end); >>> + >>> return err; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -683,27 +686,35 @@ int __vmap_pages_range_noflush(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end, >>> pgprot_t prot, struct page **pages, unsigned int page_shift) >>> { >>> unsigned int i, nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT; >>> + unsigned long start = addr; >>> + int err = 0; >>> + >>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(addr >= end)) >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> >>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(page_shift < PAGE_SHIFT)) >>> return -EINVAL; >>> >>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC) || >>> - page_shift == PAGE_SHIFT) >>> - return vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(addr, end, prot, pages); >>> - >>> - for (i = 0; i < nr; i += 1U << (page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT)) { >>> - int err; >>> - >>> - err = vmap_range_noflush(addr, addr + (1UL << page_shift), >>> + page_shift == PAGE_SHIFT) { >>> + err = vmap_small_pages_range_noflush(addr, end, prot, pages); >>> + } else { >>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i += 1U << (page_shift - PAGE_SHIFT)) { >>> + err = vmap_range_noflush(addr, addr + (1UL << page_shift), >>> page_to_phys(pages[i]), prot, >>> page_shift); >>> - if (err) >>> - return err; >>> + if (err) >>> + break; >>> >>> - addr += 1UL << page_shift; >>> + addr += 1UL << page_shift; >>> + } >>> } >>> >>> - return 0; >>> + /* Undo the PTEs installed before the failure. */ >>> + if (err) >>> + __vunmap_range_noflush(start, end); >> >> Would it be too complicated to track how much was actually mapped and >> unmap only that portion? >> > I think it is possible to vunmap the range which is already unmapped. > i.e. in this case it is better to no to track anything as soon as a > mapping failure is a corner case. Also it is more reliable without > extra track logic. Thank you both. I take note of Suren's concerns. The worst case is a single PMD where only the first page was installed, __vunmap_range_noflush() then loops 512 times to undo one PTE, plus 511 empty ones. And tracking the exact progress would require vmap_pages_p4d/pud/pmd_range() to report how far they got. That also puts counting instructions on the successful mapping path, while the saving only pays off on the failure one. So I agree with Ulad. Thanks Best Regards Hao > > -- > Uladzislau Rezki