From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: nVMX IRQ fix and VM teardown cleanups
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 19:38:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be33873f-ae4e-4db9-bca4-e83e8d4b39c3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224235542.2562848-1-seanjc@google.com>
On 2/25/25 00:55, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This was _supposed_ to be a tiny one-off patch to fix a nVMX bug where KVM
> fails to detect that, after nested VM-Exit, L1 has a pending IRQ (or NMI).
> But because x86's nested teardown flows are garbage (KVM simply forces a
> nested VM-Exit to put the vCPU back into L1), that simple fix snowballed.
>
> The immediate issue is that checking for a pending interrupt accesses the
> legacy PIC, and x86's kvm_arch_destroy_vm() currently frees the PIC before
> destroying vCPUs, i.e. checking for IRQs during the forced nested VM-Exit
> results in a NULL pointer deref (or use-after-free if KVM didn't nullify
> the PIC pointer). That's patch 1.
>
> Patch 2 is the original nVMX fix.
>
> The remaining patches attempt to bring a bit of sanity to x86's VM
> teardown code, which has accumulated a lot of cruft over the years. E.g.
> KVM currently unloads each vCPU's MMUs in a separate operation from
> destroying vCPUs, all because when guest SMP support was added, KVM had a
> kludgy MMU teardown flow that broken when a VM had more than one 1 vCPU.
> And that oddity lived on, for 18 years...
Queued patches 1 and 2 to kvm/master, and everything to kvm/queue
(pending a little more testing and the related TDX change).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-24 23:55 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: nVMX IRQ fix and VM teardown cleanups Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: x86: Free vCPUs before freeing VM state Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 7:44 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 15:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-26 7:34 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 23:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-26 0:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-26 9:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: nVMX: Process events on nested VM-Exit if injectable IRQ or NMI is pending Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: Assert that a destroyed/freed vCPU is no longer visible Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 7:07 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 14:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: x86: Don't load/put vCPU when unloading its MMU during teardown Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 7:13 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 14:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: x86: Unload MMUs during vCPU destruction, not before Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: x86: Fold guts of kvm_arch_sync_events() into kvm_arch_pre_destroy_vm() Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 23:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: Drop kvm_arch_sync_events() now that all implementations are nops Sean Christopherson
2025-02-25 12:05 ` bibo mao
2025-02-25 16:15 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2025-02-26 18:38 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2025-03-27 3:24 ` [PATCH 0/7] KVM: x86: nVMX IRQ fix and VM teardown cleanups patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be33873f-ae4e-4db9-bca4-e83e8d4b39c3@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).