From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"aik@ozlabs.ru" <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com"
<naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] objtool/mcount: Add powerpc specific functions
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 09:38:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bedd240b-d5b1-72f9-156d-96d160f180d4@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220512151206.dphxz5jyeshwc4jb@treble>
Le 12/05/2022 à 17:12, Josh Poimboeuf a écrit :
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 02:52:40PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> Le 28/03/2022 à 21:59, Josh Poimboeuf a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:09:20AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> What are current works in progress on objtool ? Should I wait Josh's
>>>> changes before starting looking at all this ? Should I wait for anything
>>>> else ?
>>>
>>> I'm not making any major changes to the code, just shuffling things
>>> around to make the interface more modular. I hope to have something
>>> soon (this week). Peter recently added a big feature (Intel IBT) which
>>> is already in -next.
>>>
>>
>> Were you able to send out something ?
>
> Yes, the objtool rewrite is now in tip/objtool/core and linux-next.
Nice.
I gave it a try this morning, I selected HAVE_OBJTOOL and
HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT from arch/powerpc/Kconfig
Seems like there are still some x86 arch specific stuff in common common
code and I get the following errors.
Also, is it normal to get those functions built allthough I have not
selected HAVE_STACK_VALIDATION ?
CC /home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/objtool/check.o
check.c: In function 'has_valid_stack_frame':
check.c:2369:30: error: 'CFI_BP' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'CFI_SP'?
2369 | if (cfi->cfa.base == CFI_BP &&
| ^~~~~~
| CFI_SP
check.c:2369:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once
for each function it appears in
check.c:2371:44: error: 'CFI_RA' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'CFI_R3'?
2371 | check_reg_frame_pos(&cfi->regs[CFI_RA],
-cfi->cfa.offset + 8))
| ^~~~~~
| CFI_R3
check.c: In function 'update_cfi_state':
check.c:2499:70: error: 'CFI_BP' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'CFI_SP'?
2499 | if (op->src.reg == CFI_SP &&
op->dest.reg == CFI_BP &&
|
^~~~~~
|
CFI_SP
make[3]: *** [/home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/build/Makefile.build:97:
/home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/objtool/check.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [Makefile:54:
/home/chleroy/linux-powerpc/tools/objtool/objtool-in.o] Error 2
make[1]: *** [Makefile:69: objtool] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1337: tools/objtool] Error 2
What would be the best approach to fix that ?
Thanks
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-21 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 10:51 [RFC PATCH 0/3] objtool: Add mcount sub-command Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-03-18 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] objtool: Move common code to utils.c Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-03-23 18:02 ` Miroslav Benes
2022-03-18 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] objtool: Enable and implement 'mcount' subcommand Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-03-21 7:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 8:19 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-03-21 8:26 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 9:48 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-03-18 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] objtool/mcount: Add powerpc specific functions Sathvika Vasireddy
2022-03-18 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-18 13:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 2:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-03-21 6:47 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 7:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 7:56 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 8:30 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 8:59 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-26 7:58 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-21 6:25 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-03-27 9:09 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-28 19:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-03-28 20:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-28 20:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-28 20:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-03-29 12:01 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-03-29 17:32 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-03-30 4:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-03-30 18:40 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-05-12 14:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-12 15:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2022-05-21 9:38 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-05-21 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-05-23 5:39 ` Naveen N. Rao
2022-03-19 1:35 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] objtool: Add mcount sub-command Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bedd240b-d5b1-72f9-156d-96d160f180d4@csgroup.eu \
--to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).