From: "Alan Bennett" <embedded@akb.net>
To: "Kumar Gala" <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: I2C on mpc8248 / device tree
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:49:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfa0697f0711140949q4cf92442gcb4c1ecf7592b040@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9AADA2CE-A7F0-4C88-BFCF-08D6C8DC09E0@kernel.crashing.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2185 bytes --]
ERk.
So if I needed to read values from four i2c devices (raw access would be
fine) and I need to get this working in a few days, how would you suggest I
proceed? Kernel = 2.6.23+.
Do I need to start from scratch?
Start by using Jon's patch (or are the 5200 i2c and the cpm2 i2c
completely incompatible?)
What about other cpm2/i2c threads - Did they ever complete?
1) On Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:01 AM Kumar Gala wrote: >* Can we
rename the driver from mpc8260 -> cpm2. The driver should work* >* on any
device that has a "CPM2" which includes a number of MPC82xx* >* and MPC85xx
processors <http://osdir.com/ml/ports.ppc.devel/2005-11/msg00153.html#>. So
calling it and its config options, etc* >* MPC8260 is going to be confusing
to users.* [PATCH] I2C: Add I2C Bus support for MPC with CPM2.
On 11/14/07, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> The patch is orthogonal to your issue.
>
> There is NOT a driver in the kernel tree for the i2c on CPM2 based
> parts like the 8248 (from what I can tell).
>
> - k
>
> On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Alan Bennett wrote:
>
> > Does this patch support the cpm2 as well?
> >
> > I get conflicting thoughts looking over the latest postings.
> >
> > -Alan
> >
> >
> > On 11/13/07, Jon Smirl < jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:I am working on
> > a patch for i2c and device tree. I attached the current version.
> >
> > DTC entry looks like this.
> >
> > i2c@3d40 {
> > compatible = "mpc5200b-i2c","mpc5200-
> > i2c","fsl-i2c";
> > reg = <3d40 40>;
> > interrupts = <2 10 0>;
> > interrupt-parent = <&mpc5200_pic>;
> > fsl5200-clocking;
> >
> > rtc@51f {
> > compatible = "epson,rtc8564";
> > reg = <51>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jon Smirl
> > jonsmirl@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> > Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4974 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-13 23:39 I2C on mpc8248 / device tree Alan Bennett
2007-11-13 23:56 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-14 15:31 ` Alan Bennett
2007-11-14 16:20 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-14 17:49 ` Alan Bennett [this message]
2007-11-14 17:56 ` Scott Wood
2007-11-14 19:26 ` Jon Smirl
2007-11-14 20:21 ` Kumar Gala
2007-11-14 7:17 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfa0697f0711140949q4cf92442gcb4c1ecf7592b040@mail.gmail.com \
--to=embedded@akb.net \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox