From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] boot: find initrd location from device-tree
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:52:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfbd4f126c427f590198a3e50a789b0c@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbae4506b772f07d2a8c1d230bea82c8@bga.com>
>>> + /* if the initrd is above 4G, its untouchable in 32 bit mode */
>>> + if (initrd_end <= UINT_MAX && initrd_start < initrd_end) {
>>> + loader_info.initrd_addr = initrd_start;
>>> + loader_info.initrd_size = initrd_end - initrd_start;
>>> + } else {
>>> + printf("ignoring loader supplied initrd parameters\n");
>>
>> Saying why might be helpful.
>
> Hmm... well, that would mean seperating the && of the if; there are two
> possible reasons. (1) this 32-bit code can't handle such large
> addresses (in which case a 64-bit kernel may work), and (2) end is >=
> start (which means there really isn't any data. I suppose I could
> reverse the sense of the if, use an else if, and make the final else
> the good path.
"ignoring loader supplied nonsensical initrd parameters"
You do need to fix the comment, though :-)
>>> +#define _LIBC_LIMITS_H_ /* don't recurse to system's
>> headers */
>>> +#include <limits.h> /* MAX_UINT, etc */
>>> +
>>
>> I think it's really a bad idea to use any headers from outside the
>> boot context here. We're dealing with explicit sized ints, so we can
>> safely define our own constants giving the limit values.
>
> As I said in the patch changelog, the only headers picked up here are
> libgcc.
Which the kernel doesn't use. It _should_ be fine
nevertheless, <limits.h> is part of the "freestanding"
headers -- why do you need to do a "libc" trick though?
This doesn't work when not using glibc I guess?
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-15 18:17 [PATCH] boot: find initrd location from device-tree Milton Miller
2007-06-15 19:55 ` Scott Wood
2007-06-18 6:08 ` Milton Miller
2007-06-18 12:52 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2007-06-19 1:25 ` David Gibson
2007-06-19 6:44 ` Segher Boessenkool
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-15 17:34 Milton Miller
2007-06-18 3:18 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfbd4f126c427f590198a3e50a789b0c@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).