From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D0BAC433EF for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Ldt3v4qkfz3c8x for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 20:31:07 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=FA5+wxqX; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=FA5+wxqX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ldt3742Wcz2xCB for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 20:30:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBAEB82114 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF7A9C341CB for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:30:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657189822; bh=LJ8kIcUgcbyvuhYKuWLU8oGvl96sZwquIj1gZMgN2sU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FA5+wxqX9p/UMoEJnFBVFTdJG7n0E5AiPEDTSjODEfSbfJbzo5R1CHIOUPVuJenV8 y7QIHmwCCaI6UrI4vwQKVnMgMdkKIKwJHn+Rty0W3fntd8bLa8TC2GDFcnP1Y8RoYk 9RqG2I79QwZA86rqkRHuJgGvK0wOxWTsfbkQ4yAZE6UjKsHuYm4+iyvvqKSaQLiKC9 tncWOhakpq9vrexNOV103vY+CQbq2nOi5oftmQqmNR3l5yka63GaRelAETP7anSftY 1HwCzpH6fDHL0gzZPzKtzV4KZlvHPckL4A1LK7jjVsOmYpWFD5LhFpfISlE43XfyWI AzgaEhVtY1KeA== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B81E2CC13B5; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:30:22 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 213079] [bisected] IRQ problems and crashes on a PowerMac G5 with 5.12.3 Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:30:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-64 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213079 --- Comment #19 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) --- (Luckily) I am no longer able to reproduce this. Re-tested on 5.19-rc5. Perhaps the problem was also specific for this specific NVMe SSD. I swapped= it for another one and now I have not seen this issue so far. I'll keep an eye on it and will close here if it stays like that for the ne= xt few stable kernels. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=