From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC258C433EF for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4K1tly2MFsz3c9v for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:11:10 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=BiEtHYkF; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=BiEtHYkF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4K1tl62PyXz3089 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:10:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E322860C1D for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56179C340E8 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:10:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645380622; bh=LE0eYhtCf6Cxu2GuaXbZG8UoIuJhhCeh3uTA9EE5Vdk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BiEtHYkFKNPxsWO7yF7IULjfGsXkBbuJHnUHR7MvDP53NfwLwgbPoPNKAxGCHHyjG V4uOmibSdJ433Y1CAYBPRClvyydeQdZqVD4hT/VWNcET4FXrhWqWOgJEWm/WZCi9TJ vsJ2KhkuZXNqgKEbgBZLyLf4dCAO83IOZgHFY2DJmyNJZjETZ5n2HhTQgt1RLBVNtH UmXouSRCrLebK9i0qv19jcX6jPLXUzHGaCGbIH3/dqqX7RZMRAUlR1H5OsUW2sT0/B vymvt298hb8CW+zhpBBkrf5mDARYrGp76qup9BC1nZTuXAwcLp184G1sxC8LijsH4E RkvswNWVZo6Pg== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 38622C05FD0; Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:10:22 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 215621] Warning: Unable to mark rodata read only on this CPU. (PPC970MP) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 18:10:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-64 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215621 Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) --- Erm ok, so it seems I did not check this thoroughly... If MMU_FTRS_PPC970 doesn't provide MMU_FTR_KERNEL_RO then perhaps CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX can be skipped in the .config so it can't be wrong= ly selected? Anyhow you are correct that this is not a bug. Thanks for the background! --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=