From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D605BECAAD5 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MG7ZC1CLmz305v for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:30:43 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=AJwdcWJx; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=AJwdcWJx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MG7YS50SFz2xGJ for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 08:30:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B4EEB80C75 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57CDC433B5 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:29:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661725798; bh=PUeEEXz547yhg+/lyxXit40xRtPpF1LW2TtB0HHOe0U=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AJwdcWJxKUvtYqr0ArrRxhRC+L6Wwz9s1mJHEijZYZYexNzu8KjR1lnmr7LmopSkl mz+YT1eh6dGoC9iBhlEA5GFXgHKERcwoW5JDhzU7wpdgdN07hghYYSqi2qd9gEoNXV A4GgnqXDPzWYfzHyeb05m8wkYw9/+6cj6cdDh5X5U94GwD9lRHOkHeLICPphGcingL QDkK95RiyVP/m2KOo1MSq7R8KB4hDnb3meLxP/4cydfu+oFACxwPRv2lvQqHJnjxNn PsrnDJpqWaZZK/UIQvVQam6Szk/rBjoFx5rDCfS5zwxGuc6U9DLFwV5X+VgMmecKr1 6FWzNf0zZ5vTw== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8419CC433E4; Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:29:58 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 215622] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:29:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-64 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: OBSOLETE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215622 Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #2 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) --- Have not seen this on 5.18.x, 5.19.x nor on 6.0-rc. I think it's safe to cl= ose here. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=