From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B541EC433EF for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 01:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KKQrx0RF0z30NW for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:09:21 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=RHX9oLgF; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=139.178.84.217; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=RHX9oLgF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KKQr741ghz2xWd for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 12:08:39 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89ACA615E0 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 01:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB774C340E9 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 01:08:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1647565716; bh=dTWz3VmtMu8+72xmV79HJRqIGr23GEsTFhaQT/fLkfI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RHX9oLgFAvEyUONrf92ED6gC0P7SFcfhVfaUHYddW2hG51XQjZYGJgY4tBPI+1HyJ C6Mat76H5OIBq9cSdjHLRfB+ZhOgHqnj4DXXmAvitLijwdVXHQuOWd3QG2TDXckeiI UAflTBjiQV18r04kxTHc8ac/RTyHFc6bEZIcNloP/gmd9ClVQ4gCtAGJ2zv4yllH/l kmEpJWvfa+MmFZ5Tf3h080QRBos2Hb67C1VaOLKJm9L24yQRRp4aVOR85ybkZtsBS1 wA25I1aUzK4/VfW8AYmLfLwYrZEAl2sUwvOwmbnqIvAvREfRn8tidOD/QAWd4mz/4E 7WtnMSdqbsqcg== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D249AC05FD0; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 01:08:35 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 215652] kernel 5.17-rc fail to load radeon DRM "modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'radeon': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg)" Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 01:08:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: CC platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Video(DRI - non Intel) X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: OBSOLETE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: drivers_video-dri@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215652 Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #10 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) --- I did not get out a meaningful result out of my reverse bisect... But v5.17.0-rc7 abd v5.17.0-rc8 do not show this issue. So closing here. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.=