From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E0BC433EF for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4KDqZz30Gtz3bTh for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:26:19 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=lr5GalxD; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::1; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=lr5GalxD; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KDqZ91zFVz2yQG for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:25:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B393CB825BA for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66A94C340F4 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:25:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1646918732; bh=7lMfV6QDcQsnZB9rAGPDeCsg9Fr7+MkN20vUwu9J8UY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lr5GalxDSdrgA+ig72jtbwBvRQ0lGbh14f1GWOlygB66KqZlaQKEKid0HI4E9a8Es RSM7tja7epQURTiqlw7A7V1zGtNLOCoeT2qUcYky7getzYy24WxYunLcfB3xy/rcSx /SGXm46keXMw4RVFM3Fl8qmj9sCUNr5QqN3nUZFt/373ciAWoUuc8l6WzGCH1kflyW 715fQxVWdh8Kiln40nx+kphp+mDQ89jS84Kz/z2EvYtjU1o7Hrwf5u/ke9HotRu8MQ dbD+D9sMmJQhmLDAoaNDCv5kMfHIUm3X/hP3PF0V2GUZJzZZkxSCuj6HxA9nq59YwT al8VHg5VO5kJw== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4420EC05F98; Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:25:32 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 215658] arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context.o Assembler messages: Error: unrecognized opcode: `dssall' (PowerMac G4) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:25:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-32@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-32 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: erhard_f@mailbox.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-32@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215658 Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Erhard F. (erhard_f@mailbox.org) --- This was Gentoo Sources v5.16.12 not upstream sources. But now I am not abl= e to reproduce it which is even more strange... Also Gentoos' v5.16.13 builds ok. What I did in the meantime was downgrading to binutils 2.37 (had 2.38 befor= e) and rebuilding the toolchain afterwards. So this probably was never a bug but an issue with my setup. ;) Closing her= e. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=