From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BA5C3F6B0 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MD0YJ6TPnz3c71 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:07:32 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=lvC7tmG3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=145.40.68.75; helo=ams.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20201202 header.b=lvC7tmG3; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MD0XT6P7yz2xGJ for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:06:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44722B82874 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24C1C433B5 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:06:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1661425603; bh=dLMsKNZJqdLkrBfA+zBi8nPw+QOP60GZidXX34+VeWM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lvC7tmG3j7wMvqF1SNzYWguewxcrKNFMKvpd/Y2nfDXUacoTFXHmdNOVqiNrgufmm fb2BomfDd1IbrnFI7JkeFT5H4IQm8Uzh1TBi2wJxi0Hz2OW5nNavnm0z+ohwBQ2F5B CKVxz1wDqrLuZ4sPp+bSsZDNpVLMIW8ClSWfHE/fDJcFEr36UT9OGnHK58Kd4zUYdc b+NPrRoVIgi+2F626JzDdevDYB5q179NHeO4xfyuIDuOP3xAcvSxvgbEXxLP6jgH9K VBjABldRSrx86DKQM0yGZm/Z+4Zce632ae65D9GE0lNJjovOOXutAZYfsD42sRy8G1 wZRtoJYl/OMvA== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C2A95C433E9; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:06:43 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [Bug 216368] do_IRQ: stack overflow at boot during btrfs handling on a PowerMac G5 11,2 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:06:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: Platform Specific/Hardware X-Bugzilla-Component: PPC-64 X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: regressions@leemhuis.info X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216368 The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressions@leem= huis.info) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |regressions@leemhuis.info --- Comment #4 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhui= s) (regressions@leemhuis.info) --- (In reply to Christophe Leroy from comment #3) > It should be investigated with BTRFS team why the callstack is so deep. Did anyone forward this to the Btrfs team? if so: where? If not I guess I c= an do that. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=